Across the river, in DC....there's this effort underway to build a trolley-car line....roughly thirty-seven miles within the District of Columbia. Cost? Well....it's figured at $1.5 billion and you can bet on it approaching $2 billion, and maybe costing even more than that.
The first part of this was supposed to be active in 2013. No one is expecting that line to be finished....because of various issues, and meet that anticipated opening. The trolley-cars are all foreign made, and electrical. Because there's a law in DC forbidding high-voltage trolleylines (going back one hundred years)....folks aren't sure if the city council will have the guts to fix this issue.
So we come to today's little item of interest. The city paid almost half a million....to tell them how this will change DC. You would have thought a report like this would have been created ten years ago when they first discussed the matter, and been part of the planning process. It wasn't.
The report says that property values (property taxes would be related) will escalate, possibly up another seven billion dollars over the next decade or two. In fact, they kinda hint that most poor folks in eastern DC....will likely be forced out as they discover various offers for their houses, and just leave DC. The black voting ratio? They don't cover that topic....but it's very likely that half the black population in eastern DC will be gone within two decades....if this trolley-car line is ever completed.
The idea here....if you think about it, is that the report convinces various big players in DC politics to climb onboard and accept expenditures for the trolley. Stores, apartments, condos, and various construction projects will eventually come because of the new trolley system.
I suspect if half the population would have realized the implications back a decade ago....of the black population being eventually pushed out....then it wouldn't have been accepted so much by the city council.
DC by 2030? I'm guessing it will be this interesting transformation....with less crime....less drugs....and maybe less corruption. Some European-style trolley-cars will be roaming across the landscape and some idiots will claim it almost looks like Amsterdam. And the likely three billion dollars spent....will seem like a great idea.
Thursday, 26 January 2012
Occupy Camping
This week, Congress (mostly the Republicans) called up the National Park Service management guys and asked some tough questions on the Occupy guys camping out in DC on Park Service grounds.
It wasn't much of a friendly situation. I watched the video of the meeting, and you can tell that the Park Service guy probably didn't want to have to explain things. The question came up....if rules exist that forbid camping on federal grounds, then how does Occupy continue to exist for weeks and months on two different sites in DC?
Well....the Park Service guy explained that if you are protesting, then your Constitutional rights fall into place, and none of the Park Service rules are enforced at that point. You can see a bit of disbelief on the faces of the Representatives at the meeting.
I sat and pondered over the explanation. I would have asked the Park Service guy another question at this point. If you suggest that Constitutional rights trump parks rules.....then could a guy from Bama travel by RV to the Grand Canyon Park entrance....put up a sign on the RV saying he was a "99-percent" protest guy and demand free entrance? Then after entering.....could he freely park the RV for weeks and months at some parking lot along the Grand Canyon....just camping out, rather than paying the $30 a day for a site deal?
I'm guessing the Park Service guy would have grinned at that point and said no....that you can only be a 99-percent guy if you hang out in Wall Street or Washington DC. Then I would have grinned and told him he'd best fire his legal staff for their advice.
The way this works....the Park Service in DC has a couple of lawyers for advice. They tend to be told by senior management that there is a end-result to where they want to be. So someone hinted that they wanted Occupy to be allowed free access within any forbidden camping rules.
Congress has come back, and it appears that the National Park Service will have to force the guys out at some point in the near future. It might be days....it might be weeks.
Here's the curious thing. They can only chase them out of National Park Service lands. The city actually has open parks.....city property, not federal property. Occupy could move and be in friendly territory. The mayor might not be happy.....but folks could be legally camping. There is a problem with this idea. Most all of the District's open property (parks and such).....are nowhere near the capital or the White House. Most is a pretty fair walk from the METRO stations. Some of these parks are in the northeast and southeast areas....where you could be shot after the sun goes down. Occupy guys aren't willing to walk a fair distance....nor would they have the guts to camp in areas where gang activity is possible. Nor would they be happy having to walk three miles to get over to the protest area.
For a brief moment.....I had these ideas of traveling the US with a big RV....and a 99-percent sign on the side, and just staying freely at national parks. I guess that just won't work in the real world.
It wasn't much of a friendly situation. I watched the video of the meeting, and you can tell that the Park Service guy probably didn't want to have to explain things. The question came up....if rules exist that forbid camping on federal grounds, then how does Occupy continue to exist for weeks and months on two different sites in DC?
Well....the Park Service guy explained that if you are protesting, then your Constitutional rights fall into place, and none of the Park Service rules are enforced at that point. You can see a bit of disbelief on the faces of the Representatives at the meeting.
I sat and pondered over the explanation. I would have asked the Park Service guy another question at this point. If you suggest that Constitutional rights trump parks rules.....then could a guy from Bama travel by RV to the Grand Canyon Park entrance....put up a sign on the RV saying he was a "99-percent" protest guy and demand free entrance? Then after entering.....could he freely park the RV for weeks and months at some parking lot along the Grand Canyon....just camping out, rather than paying the $30 a day for a site deal?
I'm guessing the Park Service guy would have grinned at that point and said no....that you can only be a 99-percent guy if you hang out in Wall Street or Washington DC. Then I would have grinned and told him he'd best fire his legal staff for their advice.
The way this works....the Park Service in DC has a couple of lawyers for advice. They tend to be told by senior management that there is a end-result to where they want to be. So someone hinted that they wanted Occupy to be allowed free access within any forbidden camping rules.
Congress has come back, and it appears that the National Park Service will have to force the guys out at some point in the near future. It might be days....it might be weeks.
Here's the curious thing. They can only chase them out of National Park Service lands. The city actually has open parks.....city property, not federal property. Occupy could move and be in friendly territory. The mayor might not be happy.....but folks could be legally camping. There is a problem with this idea. Most all of the District's open property (parks and such).....are nowhere near the capital or the White House. Most is a pretty fair walk from the METRO stations. Some of these parks are in the northeast and southeast areas....where you could be shot after the sun goes down. Occupy guys aren't willing to walk a fair distance....nor would they have the guts to camp in areas where gang activity is possible. Nor would they be happy having to walk three miles to get over to the protest area.
For a brief moment.....I had these ideas of traveling the US with a big RV....and a 99-percent sign on the side, and just staying freely at national parks. I guess that just won't work in the real world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)