Sunday, 23 October 2016

Who Would Putin Want: Trump or Clinton

If you sit and ponder on this long enough, you come to a surprising result.

If you were Russia's Putin, you'd want someone that would continually be in trouble with the American public, someone physically and mentally weak, and someone tied to continued scandals.

With Clinton's Parkinsons.....the following items are noted with the medication that you'd typically take: impulsive and compulsive behavior, hallucinations and delusions.

There is zero reliability that the Clinton Foundation will be taken down at the end of this election.....even if Hillary Clinton wins.  So I expect the inner workings of the foundation to be closely watched by the KGB and the email server to be penetrated by hackers on a daily basis.  Emails between Bill, Hillary and Chelsea?  At least a dozen Russian hackers will read them daily and deliver the best quotes back to Putin.

If you really wanted to get under Hillary's skin?  Go and time five or six events to occur at midnight, where the White House staff have to awaken Hillary and lessen her sleep schedule as much as possible.

So I generally don't believe the news media or the experts any longer.  The person that Putin would prefer is not Trump.  Although there could be one or two minor advantages with Trump.  The suggestion by Trump earlier in the year of lessening participation in NATO?  Putin might like that idea because he could push Germany around a bit and they wouldn't have the US standing in their corner.

President Clinton not grasping how Putin plays the game?  I don't think she's that keen or perceptive on foreign relations.  She wasted four years mostly just shaking hands and giving speeches.  Her state department time is utterly worthless.

As for the final key to the Putin desire for Hillary to win?  She's stuck to cellphones and easy email operations.  She has shown no tendency to upgrade or get smart.  It's all an advantage to Putin's intelligence service.

The news folks.....I think....are lost on this topic.

No comments: