I sat and read through a piece today...it was mostly critical of a editorial piece from a University of Maryland student....suggesting:"There is nothing inherently wrong with screening speakers, teachers and even students on the campus. in “intolerant” points of view “....to prevent certain groups of people from participating in campus life safely.”
Basically, the editorial was suggesting that you need to deny “intolerant perspectives.” This would help to preserve the peaceful nature of the campus.
The criticism? It came from Campus Reform, and suggests that this is something that you really don't want to start up because you don't know where it ends.
I pondered through this logic of the editorial. You see a lot of this these days....where students seem to think that too many facts change their judgement on things, and they would prefer just one story or one single line of facts....to base their decisions upon.
Rational judgement? Gone. The fact that you could add to your grasp of a subject or test your reasoning....isn't something of value to this new crowd of college students.
If you asked me for ten reasons why a college education doesn't mean much in today's atmosphere, this is one of those reasons.
You could easily end up with a bunch of idiots who have no interest in Socrates or Plato....nor desiring to understand Mao or Churchill.
This whole safety discussion going on in campus life is creating a group of 'wussy' intellectuals who will be unable to handle real-life situations. We will be graduating thousands of these individuals who can't work in certain companies or perform certain functions because they simply don't have the ability to reason and reach rational levels of understanding.
In some ways, they are defeating the term intellectual and becoming something very much less than that.