To be honest, I'm of the mind that Trump will not run for re-election in 2020. Chief reason? Most of what he expected to change will start to be seen in 2019 and he'll see no reason to do another four years. I think his physical health is being challenged by this daily routine and that will add into the mix as well.
So, what's the landscape look like?
Twenty-two democrats are said to be exploring a run: Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Saunders, Cory Booker from NJ, Cuomo of NY, Tim Kaine, Mark Cuban (the business guy), and then fifteen lesser folks. Hillary? Potentially, yes.
Age ought to take out Joe Biden, but some folks aren't sure.
The odds of Obama coming back to run again? Legally, he could run after sitting out for four years. For Democratic Party, it'd be a win-win but a fair number of DC crowd would like their chance at the 'glory'.
For the Republicans? VP Pence, UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, and a couple of governors. If you went and measured up accomplishments and 'shine' over the past five months....Haley is probably the shocker. If she stays at the job until late 2019 before exiting for a campaign....she might have a fair number of topics to put her in the top of the group.
The news media in all this? They are expending every single silver-bullet that they have and I think the general trust by the public will be viewed in fairly negative numbers by 2020. The real loser over this four-year period.....will be the national news media.
For the Democrats talking about this great lesson learned from the Hillary loss? In the end (2020), it'll be mostly a myth of some change.
Sunday, 28 May 2017
“He said that Muslims couldn’t exercise their religion peacefully in France. He spoke with words that didn’t belong to him. He was under a spell, like a cult.”-- Mother of Adel Karmiche, Islamic terrorist who killed a priest in Normandy, France in 2016, in a NY Daily News article
I sit and read an awful lot over terror acts and the gentlemen behind them. The fine details.....often have to be gained through hours of reading and analyzing.
There are generally five descriptive reminders that you can use for the bulk of these individuals involved in terror attacks.
First, most all of them are under the age thirty. You might find a handful of 30-to-35 year old guys....but there's virtually no one over the age of forty. If you were to go and look over the list of terror attacks and the descriptions of the 'players'....the vast majority are between 18 and 25 years old. For the most part, you'd say they are immature young men.
Second, it is painfully obvious as the mother described her son Adel from this Normandy attack....he at this point in his life a full-up recruited cult member. The cult owned him....body and soul.
Cults work hard to ensure ownership over their 'team-members'. It's personal property to them. Cults don't care about the guy, just that he serves the cult's purpose.
Third, almost none of the terrorists that have been seen in the past twenty years....had a real occupation. Some pretended to be students. Some were legit drug-dealers or small-time thugs. You won't find carpenters, roofers, plumbers, mechanics, or dry-way guys among them. This is one of the odd features of this whole racket. These are mostly what you'd kindly refer to as 'losers'.
Fourth, most of the individuals noted in this category have drug usage noted. They aren't just a once-a-week weed-smoker....they smoke daily and probably two or three times a day. They probably pop captagon pills or occasionally use type of uppers. Even during the act of terrorism...if you did a drug test on all of these guys....they are pumped up on something.
Fifth, in the suicidal phase for these young men.....all aspire to do some greater good to be known for. They've lost so much touch with reality, that they can only dream of the after-life as their ticket to success.
Normally, folks would get all hyped up against cults....but no one wants to touch that topic in this case. So, we will simply continue on.