Well....there are four facts. First, Nina Jancowitz was 'toxic' for the leadership position and had zero vetting by the White House. Second, the minute you heard disinformation....you had this '1984' thing in your mind. Third, no one could say what it's job was going to be...without grinning. Finally, no one from the House/Senate seemed to know it was being created (or acted that way).
Nina out? What they say.....she got an invite to the White House, and some understanding....the whole thing was going to be reviewed....with her out of the job.
Disinformation bureau gone permanently? No.....no one said that.
It'll come back in a year, with a totally different name....different angle. I doubt that it'll be housed in Homeland Security.
This whole thing having a 'smell' of being related to President Obama's former team? Well....yeah, that's the funny thing about this whole thing, and the lack of chatting with the House or Senate? That kinda funnels things back to the way that Obama's team worked.
Another name for it? I'd just call it the '1984-Bureau' but I'm sure folks wouldn't approve of that.
Was Nina unqualified for this? On a scale of one to ten, for senior management for a group like this? I'd give her a '3-plus'. She knew how to produce disinformation, but beyond that....no, she didn't have the maturity or qualifications.
I will say.....creating this early in a mid-term year.....just had a funny 'smell' to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment