Another Gin For Everyone

 I watched about 15 minutes of episode II of the House hearing on the 6-Jan business.  I stopped and did a long pause.

There was a moment in this 'theatrical-show' today where I started to imagine an actual set of circumstances existing between 6-Jan chatter and the old Trump/Russia gimmick (actually hoax is more appropriate).  

Both lean on some perceived accusations and both eventually come to some perceived conclusions of guilt.

Oddly....both events (6-Jan/Trump-Russia)....require a normal viewer to dedicate probably 500 man-hours to associate data, and feel some conviction one way or another.  Frankly, most of us have real jobs....church meetings....bowling leagues...fences to paint....kid-lectures to emphasize...whiskey-moments, and demons to fight.  

Lot of hyperbole?  Well...yeah, that becomes painfully obvious.

Could we have a hearing dedicated to the fake Trump-Russia gimmick and really explain how the hoax came to be?  No.  That would draw up more perceived accusations, and more perceived conclusions of guilt.  

(Just shaking my head....another gin for everyone at the bar)