Sunday 17 January 2021

Conspiracy Theories: JFK

 Another one of my discussions on conspiracy theories.

Facts:

1.  JFK was shot on 22 November 1963.

2.  Oswald, the accused shooter was killed on 24 November 1963, by Jack Ruby (local mafia character in Dallas).  

3.  Warren Commission finishes project on 24 September 1964....one shooter-one magic bullet theory is the end-result.

I have no doubt that JFK was shot by Oswald on the 24th.  But once you enter the magic-bullet idea into the mix, and ask this type of situation to be conducted a hundred times....the odds are that it'll only happen one single time of the hundred.  At that point, the theory is questionable. So enters the more likely scenario of a second-shooter.  

Add to this....the long sorted story of Oswald, which just seems fairly unbelievable.  Then you add in some patriotic character like Jack Ruby who is absolutely a guy that the mafia can count upon.

Was the mafia connected into this?  I think they were called on the 23rd and asked to clean up a particular messy situation because Oswald didn't exit the building in the correct direction and didn't get shot by the pre-planned police.  Beyond that....I doubt if the mafia really knew anything going on. 

For years after this Ruby mission, I think a dozen-odd members of the mafia knew bits of the story, and just sat there shaking their head over how they got taken into this whole mess.  

I would add this comment....if you'd said for this to be arranged via the mafia....there's a hundred other ways they would have accomplished this without shooting drama business being involved.

As for who might have been the planning group?  It's just odd....the one guy that Kennedy absolutely fired from the CIA (28 November 1961)...Dulles....is one of the seven people put on the Warren Commission.  

The other 500-odd conspiracy 'links'?  Well....they make for an interesting conversation but most all just lead in circles with no additional facts in the mix.  

The Basic Problem of Student College-Loan Forgiveness

 Basically, you are asking me to financially forgive some supposedly highly gifted intellectual dumbass, who borrowed way more money than his degree ever was worth, and he can't possibly find a job that pays at the level to cover the $80k to $120k 'pit' that he or she seems to have fallen down into.

If this were your son 'Marvin' who wrecked his 7-year old Toyota and needed $8k....maybe that would make sense until Marvin admitted he was pretty wasted at the time, and the brake-light had been on for two weeks.

If this were your daughter 'Tiffney'.....who accidentally set her trailer on fire last weekend, and needed you to compensate her with $22k for a new trailer....it'd make sense to help her out.  Course, when you found out that she was hyped-up on meth, and intentionally set the mattress on fire....would you pull the money from savings to help her?

If this were your nephew 'Woody' who wanted $15k for a 'worm-farm' enterprise....you'd ask some questions and discover that Woody doesn't have a business plan or any idea how the farm would work.  Your odds of loaning him the money?

So I'm looking at this Biden project and asking three key questions:

1.  If these idiots were stupid enough to borrow $80k for a worthless degree....what's that say about their level of common sense, and the odds they'd go and borrow $150k somewhere else in the future.....to potentially fail on that loan?  This sounds like the idiot bankers and insurance idiots of 2008, who were too supid to run their business operation.  

2.  If I made it to a bachelor's degree, without borrowing a nickel....what's it say about these idiots who borrowed $90k?  What did I do wrong?

3.  Finally, if we have that many worthless degrees out there....shouldn't there be a plan to dismantle the whole public college platform and dissolve about forty-percent of the programs that exist?  Just tell the kid that two years of HVAC studies at a junior college gets the same level of pay as a worthless degree at a four-year college.  

My chief problem here now?  I have to sit there and listen to 100 different idiot senators who appear to be even more stupid than the kid who got into $100k of debt with a degree in gender-studies and no real job prospect except running some department in Pennys or Wal-Mart.  

The Chief Problem of the Biden Amnesty for 11-to-22 Million Illegals

 Right now, across the US.....somewhere between 11 and 22 million illegals exist in the nation.  Texas, California, Illinois, NY, NJ and Florida are figured to have 59-percent (2014 numbers) of the total number.  So you can figure that the other 45 states have only 40 percent.  

The PEW folks figured back in 2017.....from the top twenty urbanized areas of the US....they held close to 10.7 million in illegals.  

The two states at the bottom?  Montana and Vermont....figured to be around 3 to 4 thousand in each state.

So once the paperwork is signed, and Congress passes the agenda....the amnesty is then on the table, and these flip from illegal to legal folks.

Will their jobs as illegals then go to normal pay/normal benefits?  No.  I don't think a single shop or business will deal with them from that point on.  

New illegals likely to wander in by 2022?  Yes.  I would take a guess that between two and three million illegals will arrive after this amnesty deal is done, and within five years....another five million will arrive.

You see...these business fronts operate with one simple rule....cheapest employee possible.  If Biden removes that option....you simply go looking for the next guy, who is illegally in the US.

Now, you can ask yourself....in the middle of a Covid-19 situation, massive unemployment in several states....would it be wise to add 10-million legal folks onto the situation?  Most PhD guys would stand there and just grin....if there are not jobs for folks already in the middle of the mess....what idiot would go and add more to this?

Will these newly blessed amnesty folks go and ask for unemployment compensation?  Maybe, but in most states.....unless you can show legal work already (they can't), then you don't get a 'deal'.

There's going to be a fair mess sitting there by the end of 2021, and probably laying there for three or four years....before Congress can admit that this made a huge chaotic thing that can't be resolved.  

But lets add one single 'cherry' to this game.  If you have a dozen-million illegals-flipped-to-legals in the top twenty urbanized areas of the US....where exactly will new migrants (the new illegals) position themselves in 2021/2022?  

Well....the top twenty urbanized areas of the US....naturally.  If these areas already had problems?  Don't worry....just another layer on top of the original situation.  

I doubt if Biden himself understands any of this, and probably the majority of his handlers are the same way.  They've simply convinced themselves of some noble deed accomplished.  

Observations

 1.  It's nothing to laugh about, but in the last day or two....DC security folks announced that 43 National Guards people sent for security over the inauguration business....have Covid-19 and are on quarantine.  

Of the 7,000 on duty.....you can figure by Wednesday....at least another forty will show positive, and probably a hundred will be performing duty with symptoms (to show positive by Friday).  Passing it along to the couple hundred-thousand there for the inauguration?  Oh, one could probably estimate that a couple thousand visitors will get it....then pass it along to folks at home by Saturday and Sunday of next week.  

By the time the Nat'l Guard gets dismissed?  You can figure that three-hundred will be Covid-19 positive, and as they act as guards in the capital building....they will sneeze and pass it along to hundreds of capital building residents (Senators and Congressmen).

2.  There is a discussion going on in NY City....to have a $3 'tax' on delivered goods.  If you ordered $5 of screws and bolts via some on-line deal....you'd pay the sales tax, then some delivery tax.  

As you can imagine....it's not going over well.

3.  Lets say you had some big event (like a Super Bowl or inauguration), with 100,000 people arriving in some city....in the middle of a epidemic.  Folks stay around at hotels and restaurants for three days, and pass Covid-19 around themselves.  Two weeks later....they've been able to spread the virus among 250,000 (while on the road, traveling via airports, staying at other hotels going/returning, and sipping beers at various pubs along the way).  

Do you feel guilty of anything?

4.  Some people suggest that 20-percent of people who'd typically vote for Republican candidates....won't do so in 2022's mid-term.  

I would go to suggest that in a minimum of twenty states....the number is actually closer to 75-percent who won't vote for Republican candidates.  If the trend were to continue through 2024?  The party is mostly finished.

5.  On making incitement a crime?  Well....just suggesting via some Baptist idiot that you might be going to hell for your behavior....might be enough to identify that as incitement.  

Professional wrestling?  Pure incitement.  

Announcing cancellation to a flight after waiting six hours....pure incitement.

Having police to arrive on a raid?  Pure incitement.

6.  Growing number of studies over Covid-19 suggest that memory loss and cognitive decline are part of the effects.  A guy or gal getting it two or three times in the next decade (in their twenties)?  They probably aren't going to be producing much of anything in their forties.

7.  Anything that is 'free'.....probably on the scale of actual value and dependability....is less than zero.  (Facebook, Twitter, email services, etc).