I worked with a guy who grew up about an hour outside of Atlanta (closer to Rome than Atlanta). We'd often have discussions over the Braves, and to a lesser degree....the state itself.
At some point in the 2005-2009 era....we talked about the transformation of Atlanta, and he used the analogy of 'OLD-Atlanta' and 'NEW-Atlanta'.
OLD-Atlanta shifted in the 1970s....with a majority of blacks being noted, and what whites existed in the 1940s/1950s/1960s....pulled up stakes and moved 20 to 40 miles outside of town.
OLD-Atlanta was shifting from marginal airport....to the international-airport
OLD-Atlanta was building convention centers, hotels, and high-rises.
OLD-Atlanta was talking about metro-status by the end of the 1980s.
NEW-Atlanta? Suburbia-shift occurred....black population decreased, young college graduate jobs began to appear.
NEW-Atlanta....Braves left town and kinda labeled themselves as 'outside of Atlanta'.
NEW-Atlanta....crime started to be noticed....with drugs and gangs.
Urbania-Atlanta vote? Mostly had shifted to anti-Republican....his belief....seven out of ten 'locals' were identifying as hardcore Democrat.
Then he said the magic words....there were two states....the state of Atlanta (to include the airport and the Braves-zone), and the state of Georgia. It's like talking about Nashville and Tennessee in 2026.
I humored him for a while...weren't the two on the same agenda?
He responded....one day....they will be on separate agendas....both trying to declare they were rebuilding NEW-Atlanta and Georgia itself....into something else, but no matter how you describe it....they just weren't the same landscape.
After the election of last week....I'm wondering about this two-agenda landscape.
Maybe it's just a chatter-topic....like stuff you'd talk about over a whiskey or two. Maybe it's something where half the state is fretting over 'change'.