There is this epic point of my family history where the family members leave 'civilization' (namely....Surry, North Carolina). It's the area or county around Mount Pilot and Mount Airy....from the Andy Griffith series.
It's a combination of two reasons....property prices are escalating and crops have burnt out. The general strategy of farmers throughout the 1600s and 1700s of the new colony in America was to plant the only two crops that made cash money.....cotton and tobacco...YEAR after YEAR. Naturally, land nutrients shifted around and without fertilizer.....you started to notice less and less production after the fifth year of same crop usage. Dutch farmers in more northern states knew of the issue and had several crops....which they tended to shift around on properties....to help with nutrients. Of course, this meant a smaller profit scale but more stability.
So, the two sons of "Joseph" (1753-1829) set in motion this migration past the state line and into the wild frontier. Joseph doesn't have a big rich history tied to himself. At one point, he did own 200 acres of property, served with some distinction in the Revolutionary War, and had a total of two sons and two daughters.
The two sons? "Jim" and "William". Jim was born in 1784 and William in 1787. Jim is my ancestor.
Jim ends up marrying Maggie Boggs, who was born in 1797. He was roughly fourteen years old at the time. Maggie (born in 1785) would have been twelve years old. On the outer edge of the frontier....the age deal probably was somewhat typical at the time.
Over the next eighteen-odd years....there's only one child from this marriage. Somewhere around 1813....Maggie passes away. There's a decision made that year by Jim to pack up and leave for the new frontier, with his brother. Their original target was Indiana but discovered two years into this episode that the winters were too harsh. The move from NC to Indiana....sometime around 1815. The move to Alabama? Around 1817/1818.
The original arrival point? Dugout, Tennesssee. It's a an area on Second Creek and near Lawrenceberg. For a while, they camped out there, and then made it further south to the Whitehead area where there was a trading post of some type. The trip ended at that point. They both stayed on and settled in the local area.
Alabama property sales started in the 1819 period, so they likely settled and purchased property.
For all practical purposes.....these two were in the new frontier for barely a year or two....then civilization arrived (statehood).
Friday, 3 April 2015
Wednesday, 1 April 2015
Volvo Coming
Over the weekend....Volvo finally put out an announcement.....they will build a plant in the US...their first plant to manufacture Volvo cars.
Rumor has it that North Carolina is one of the states, with at least two additional states involved in negotiation right now.
Most Americans have zero knowledge over Volvo and probably would never buy the car.
From the historical prospective.....there are three eras of Volvo.
The first era, from 1927 to the early 1970s.....was the Swedish era (my term). They were a Swedish company and built cars for sale primarily within the Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland). What you can typically say was that it was an engineer's car....built a decade ahead of most technology that you saw with the automobile industry. They weren't booming....but they were making a fair profit.
In the early 1970s.....the second era came.....where Volvo branched out into Europe and the US. What made their cars better than everyone's cars was the safety factor. They put every possible safety option known at the time into the standard Volvo cars. The legend was.....if you got into a Volvo and had an accident.....you survived.
The problem with the second era Volvo cars was that they were "plain" and expensive. You paid twenty to thirty percent more for a Swedish-made Volvo. There wasn't any sports-car version, and no one under the age of thirty would buy a Volvo.
Chinese investors came after 2008 and bought the company.....they were in serious jeopardy at the time like several major car companies. Thus....we enter the third era....where the company survives but with Chinese ownership.
If you sat down and listed the forty top safety items that could be put into a car....you'd discover that Volvo tends to have every single item in the standard car (it's not optional in their mind). Between that and the Swedish manufacturing costs.....that's the primary reason why Volvo cars cost so much in the US.
Would a US plant change the perception and the cost? I imagine that they've figured the formula and might be able to find a model or two that fits into the prospective of an American buyer.....for the right price. It's an enticement to get you....the buyer....into a Volvo franchise and get you to first base to buy your first Volvo. Maybe ten years down the line.....as you get ready for a replacement vehicle....you'd want to spend the extra $15,000 and buy the typical $45,000 Volvo SUV or four-door car.
I've never owned a Volvo....but I've ridden in a couple. It's like a plain sports-car version of a Lincoln Towncar. The ride is perfect....the style is professional....the horsepower is there, and you find no flaws.
I agree....it'll take a while and most Americans will just ask where the heck it's made. But after a brief ride from a dealer's model......you might start crunching the numbers and realize that the safety factor in the Volvo adds $100,000 onto the value of the car. Maybe it'll help you survive an accident....which is something that you typically don't think about with the Mustang or Dodge Charger.
Anyway....Volvo is a name you might hear more often now.
Rumor has it that North Carolina is one of the states, with at least two additional states involved in negotiation right now.
Most Americans have zero knowledge over Volvo and probably would never buy the car.
From the historical prospective.....there are three eras of Volvo.
The first era, from 1927 to the early 1970s.....was the Swedish era (my term). They were a Swedish company and built cars for sale primarily within the Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland). What you can typically say was that it was an engineer's car....built a decade ahead of most technology that you saw with the automobile industry. They weren't booming....but they were making a fair profit.
In the early 1970s.....the second era came.....where Volvo branched out into Europe and the US. What made their cars better than everyone's cars was the safety factor. They put every possible safety option known at the time into the standard Volvo cars. The legend was.....if you got into a Volvo and had an accident.....you survived.
The problem with the second era Volvo cars was that they were "plain" and expensive. You paid twenty to thirty percent more for a Swedish-made Volvo. There wasn't any sports-car version, and no one under the age of thirty would buy a Volvo.
Chinese investors came after 2008 and bought the company.....they were in serious jeopardy at the time like several major car companies. Thus....we enter the third era....where the company survives but with Chinese ownership.
If you sat down and listed the forty top safety items that could be put into a car....you'd discover that Volvo tends to have every single item in the standard car (it's not optional in their mind). Between that and the Swedish manufacturing costs.....that's the primary reason why Volvo cars cost so much in the US.
Would a US plant change the perception and the cost? I imagine that they've figured the formula and might be able to find a model or two that fits into the prospective of an American buyer.....for the right price. It's an enticement to get you....the buyer....into a Volvo franchise and get you to first base to buy your first Volvo. Maybe ten years down the line.....as you get ready for a replacement vehicle....you'd want to spend the extra $15,000 and buy the typical $45,000 Volvo SUV or four-door car.
I've never owned a Volvo....but I've ridden in a couple. It's like a plain sports-car version of a Lincoln Towncar. The ride is perfect....the style is professional....the horsepower is there, and you find no flaws.
I agree....it'll take a while and most Americans will just ask where the heck it's made. But after a brief ride from a dealer's model......you might start crunching the numbers and realize that the safety factor in the Volvo adds $100,000 onto the value of the car. Maybe it'll help you survive an accident....which is something that you typically don't think about with the Mustang or Dodge Charger.
Anyway....Volvo is a name you might hear more often now.
Tuesday, 31 March 2015
That Religious Law Business
Let's say that you ran a Jewish bakery and did cakes for customers. One day....a guy walks in and he wants a Nazi cake....with the expression "Work Makes You Free" on the top (the expression used in death camps).
You politely refuse. He threatens with a court order, then takes you to court because you refused him as a customer.
Let's say that you ran a simple Amish cake business (note: you are Amish in this scenario, if you were wondering), and a gal comes in who wants a cake made with the comment "Happy Birthday, your loving whore" on top of the cake in icing. Your Amish tradition is such....you refuse to take the order.
You politely refuse. She threatens with a court order, then he takes you to court because you refused her as a customer.
Let's say that you ran a simple plain bakery and a guy comes in and wants you to make a cake with the expression written in icing on top "F**K Obama". You think about this for a minute....being a middle-of-the-road guy.....NOT a Republican or Democrat....then say no, you just don't do cakes like that....NOR do you want your reputation to get around that you do sleazy cakes like that.
You politely refuse. He threatens with a court order, then he takes you to court because you refused him as a customer.
Up in Indiana....folks thought long and hard about where this business of pushing people around in their private business operations and the potential abuse of the court system, then started SB 101...the Religious Freedom Act....which limits what the state and it's judges can do in a case where you turn down a customer.
Fifty years ago....you could refuse anyone. No shoes....crappy words on a t-shirt.....maggots in the hair....drunk behavior....drugged-up behavior....cursing...etc. You could make any reason and just say no.....I won't serve you or do business with you.
That worked up until the last decade when people felt you might use sex in some way against someone special. These days....if you asked for a bondage-like message on a wedding cake, with whips and handcuffs.....some folks might be disturbed about that and want to refuse to make the cake. Submission of the wife to the husband? Someone might want a cake with that scenario figured into the situation.
Yeah, we got creative, and 'stupid'.
There are guys who used to come up on a Friday afternoon with their private business and shut down everything at 5PM (two hours ahead of the normal quitting time).....so employees would have a chance to attend a kid's football game that night. They made decisions on their own "dime". In today's world.....folks would get all disturbed about some private business owner making his own decision and want to inflict law into the mess.
Today, I read that the Seattle folks and Washington state folks.....got all disturbed about the Indiana law and have banned state travel to Indiana. Pretty serious. But then you'd ask this stupid question....in twenty years....what formal meeting or business gathering in Indiana did they ever have or attend? What.....maybe two meetings in twenty years and maybe a dozen state or city folks attending?
It's a gimmick. You laugh over the results and figure their best punch.....was a fairly lame punch with no effect. Indiana folks retaliating and forbidding travel to Seattle and Washington state? Well....same results.
States act like they are some foreign third-world country....like Peru, and they can make thing happen of great consequence. Well....no.....it's just not that way. And all of this over gays? Would they get tough if Nazis wanted their cakes done in a special way, or anti-American-Indian people wanted their cakes done in a special way?
All of this brings me to this final observation. Is there anything wrong with folks getting a plain Duncan-Hines cake mix deal....and making a plain old chocolate cake....without anything on top except 'happy birthday' written in icing? A plain four-dollar cake? Yeah. All this political chatter....when you really don't need to get hyper about special cakes. That's it.
You politely refuse. He threatens with a court order, then takes you to court because you refused him as a customer.
Let's say that you ran a simple Amish cake business (note: you are Amish in this scenario, if you were wondering), and a gal comes in who wants a cake made with the comment "Happy Birthday, your loving whore" on top of the cake in icing. Your Amish tradition is such....you refuse to take the order.
You politely refuse. She threatens with a court order, then he takes you to court because you refused her as a customer.
Let's say that you ran a simple plain bakery and a guy comes in and wants you to make a cake with the expression written in icing on top "F**K Obama". You think about this for a minute....being a middle-of-the-road guy.....NOT a Republican or Democrat....then say no, you just don't do cakes like that....NOR do you want your reputation to get around that you do sleazy cakes like that.
You politely refuse. He threatens with a court order, then he takes you to court because you refused him as a customer.
Up in Indiana....folks thought long and hard about where this business of pushing people around in their private business operations and the potential abuse of the court system, then started SB 101...the Religious Freedom Act....which limits what the state and it's judges can do in a case where you turn down a customer.
Fifty years ago....you could refuse anyone. No shoes....crappy words on a t-shirt.....maggots in the hair....drunk behavior....drugged-up behavior....cursing...etc. You could make any reason and just say no.....I won't serve you or do business with you.
That worked up until the last decade when people felt you might use sex in some way against someone special. These days....if you asked for a bondage-like message on a wedding cake, with whips and handcuffs.....some folks might be disturbed about that and want to refuse to make the cake. Submission of the wife to the husband? Someone might want a cake with that scenario figured into the situation.
Yeah, we got creative, and 'stupid'.
There are guys who used to come up on a Friday afternoon with their private business and shut down everything at 5PM (two hours ahead of the normal quitting time).....so employees would have a chance to attend a kid's football game that night. They made decisions on their own "dime". In today's world.....folks would get all disturbed about some private business owner making his own decision and want to inflict law into the mess.
Today, I read that the Seattle folks and Washington state folks.....got all disturbed about the Indiana law and have banned state travel to Indiana. Pretty serious. But then you'd ask this stupid question....in twenty years....what formal meeting or business gathering in Indiana did they ever have or attend? What.....maybe two meetings in twenty years and maybe a dozen state or city folks attending?
It's a gimmick. You laugh over the results and figure their best punch.....was a fairly lame punch with no effect. Indiana folks retaliating and forbidding travel to Seattle and Washington state? Well....same results.
States act like they are some foreign third-world country....like Peru, and they can make thing happen of great consequence. Well....no.....it's just not that way. And all of this over gays? Would they get tough if Nazis wanted their cakes done in a special way, or anti-American-Indian people wanted their cakes done in a special way?
All of this brings me to this final observation. Is there anything wrong with folks getting a plain Duncan-Hines cake mix deal....and making a plain old chocolate cake....without anything on top except 'happy birthday' written in icing? A plain four-dollar cake? Yeah. All this political chatter....when you really don't need to get hyper about special cakes. That's it.
Breakfast at McDonalds All Day?
There's a rumor out today of a test going on at one McDonalds in the US (in San Diego as the story goes)....where they intend to take a number of breakfast items on the menu and just keep them up all day long.
Over the past year.....McDonalds has hit some business peak and gone a step backwards. The CEO was let go a month ago and they are in the mind to take aggressive steps to regain business. But this gimmick of breakfast all day?
I have had breakfast at both McDonalds and Burger King over the past few years. To be honest.....it's my absolute last choice. Other than the sausage biscuit at both.....it's a one-star breakfast in my mind. There's no real taste and the quality just isn't noticeable. I might give a thumbs-up on the pancake menu but that's a marginal thumbs-up.
Making a difference? I'm guessing around some retirement communities....there might be some interest in this idea, but I doubt if you'd sell some breakfast item after noon to more than twenty people.
The other day here in Germany.....I walked by a Subway location and they had introduced a breakfast menu.....an odd selection but there were a dozen people standing there....sipping coffee and eating some kind of egg-sausage combo.
Threatening the business angle of Waffle House? No....it's hard for McDonalds to meet the greasy quality, salty texture, and fatty nature of my favorite breakfast enterprise. I admit....it doesn't matter....6AM, noon or 6PM.....I'd still order the breakfast menu at Waffle House. Maybe McDonalds figures you'd eventually get addicted to their gimmick.
Over the past year.....McDonalds has hit some business peak and gone a step backwards. The CEO was let go a month ago and they are in the mind to take aggressive steps to regain business. But this gimmick of breakfast all day?
I have had breakfast at both McDonalds and Burger King over the past few years. To be honest.....it's my absolute last choice. Other than the sausage biscuit at both.....it's a one-star breakfast in my mind. There's no real taste and the quality just isn't noticeable. I might give a thumbs-up on the pancake menu but that's a marginal thumbs-up.
Making a difference? I'm guessing around some retirement communities....there might be some interest in this idea, but I doubt if you'd sell some breakfast item after noon to more than twenty people.
The other day here in Germany.....I walked by a Subway location and they had introduced a breakfast menu.....an odd selection but there were a dozen people standing there....sipping coffee and eating some kind of egg-sausage combo.
Threatening the business angle of Waffle House? No....it's hard for McDonalds to meet the greasy quality, salty texture, and fatty nature of my favorite breakfast enterprise. I admit....it doesn't matter....6AM, noon or 6PM.....I'd still order the breakfast menu at Waffle House. Maybe McDonalds figures you'd eventually get addicted to their gimmick.
Monday, 30 March 2015
Fixing the Unbroken Thing and Then Fixing the Fix
Years ago, I made a simple decision (without a lot of forethought) of joining the Air Force. There was a ten-minute video that the recruiter played of basic training....to ensure that I understood the six-week training episode.
The goal in the mid-70's for Air Force basic training was simple. Teach the overall idea of obeying a standard of work ethic. They structured the barracks life, the folding of t-shirts and underwear (along with socks) into part of that work ethic. Clustered around this....was the art of marching. The icing on the cake was physical activities which got you into fairly decent shape within a six-week period. If you weren't in shape prior to arrival.....you were by the sixth week.
There were around a dozen hours of training structured into mental things....like racism and sexism. It was a basic introduction to behavior modification.
Then you left and went off to some technical training school.
To be honest....all of the folding of t-shirts, underwear and socks came to an absolute end. Lights out or curfew basically ended. The mental stuff on racism and sexism? That continued on as you arrived at each new base.....you had a half-day reminder thrust upon you.
I'll be honest....it's hard to modify an eighteen-year-old kid in six weeks. Even if you had nine weeks...it's difficult to modify someone. Basic Training is just a brief orientation course to get you up to a certain level.
Occasionally.....roughly every decade....the generals and chiefs meet and resolve to fix a "broke" Basic Training situation for the Air Force. Folks kinda laugh about this. After the Vietnam War, I came into the newer structured Air Force....no push-ups, more emphasis on avoiding sexism and racism, and gentle reminders by the instructors instead of harsh 'yelling'.
In the eighties, they resolved to fix Basic Training again. In the nineties.....another new repair job. And a decade ago came what I'd refer to as "Strike Force" training.....making the Air Force appear slightly more Army than the previous Air Force.
To accomplish the new agenda....they needed to roughly two more weeks. This meant more physical challenges....more compound-like scenarios....sandbags...guns....etc.
This all came after 9-11 and the Air Force slowly got drafted into handing young airman, NCOs and junior officers over to ground units in Afghanistan and Iraq. Convoy and guard duty. Not of the jobs fit into the previous Air Force structure or training. So they actually had to invent another class for everyone to attend and learn how to act "Army". I know.....it was fairly amusing. If you wanted to be "Army"......you would have joined the Army.
The generals and chiefs took some criticism and rebuilt Air Force Basic Training into this "Strike Force" idea (my term for it, not theirs).
The odd thing with the two extra weeks added to the training schedule.....not one single extra training was added to the manpower listings. Yeah....it was amazing that they actually accomplished this without any extra help.
Oddly, within five years.....various sandals started to erupt out of Basic Training. Most of it was because instructors were caught doing stupid stuff.
Blame? Well....they eventually decided that there just wasn't enough character-building in boot-camp. So another new fix is being prepared and introduced (the next version of Air Force Basic Training), and it's all about older officers and instructors (not necessarily NCOs) instructing on character-building. The program name? "Capstone".
What CAN you teach in eight to nine weeks to radically change some kid out of high school? Basically, you are asking for the impossible. This might come across to a quarter of the folks there, but the bulk probably need an entire year of character-building.....to have any measurable results. Then the odd thing is that you'd turn those young folks loose onto the corrupted Air Force world and watch them ask stupid questions of older NCOs and officers in general.
I came to a radical point in the 1990s before retiring from the Air Force....where I questioned anyone who said something was 'broke' and needed fixing. I often had found that solutions were often the trigger of a consequence, and actually made a situation much worse than it already was. Rather than revamping an entire program.....if you marginally made one simple change....the effect of the change solved the entire problem. Rather than million-dollar solutions....I came to realize the nickel-solution was often more practical.
The problem with nickel-solutions is that no one gets medals for them or promotion brownie-points. Everyone wants mega changes that revolve around entire new manpower solutions or costly structural changes.
A decade from now.....the Air Force generals and chiefs will meet again....some new scandal....some newly created problem, and fix up another massive change. In forty years....I expect Air Force boot-camp to be an entire year in length. No one will be able to explain why, but they will discover that character-building is not a one-week phase of life introduction. It requires something that classrooms can't deliver upon.
Just my two cents of humble observation.
The goal in the mid-70's for Air Force basic training was simple. Teach the overall idea of obeying a standard of work ethic. They structured the barracks life, the folding of t-shirts and underwear (along with socks) into part of that work ethic. Clustered around this....was the art of marching. The icing on the cake was physical activities which got you into fairly decent shape within a six-week period. If you weren't in shape prior to arrival.....you were by the sixth week.
There were around a dozen hours of training structured into mental things....like racism and sexism. It was a basic introduction to behavior modification.
Then you left and went off to some technical training school.
To be honest....all of the folding of t-shirts, underwear and socks came to an absolute end. Lights out or curfew basically ended. The mental stuff on racism and sexism? That continued on as you arrived at each new base.....you had a half-day reminder thrust upon you.
I'll be honest....it's hard to modify an eighteen-year-old kid in six weeks. Even if you had nine weeks...it's difficult to modify someone. Basic Training is just a brief orientation course to get you up to a certain level.
Occasionally.....roughly every decade....the generals and chiefs meet and resolve to fix a "broke" Basic Training situation for the Air Force. Folks kinda laugh about this. After the Vietnam War, I came into the newer structured Air Force....no push-ups, more emphasis on avoiding sexism and racism, and gentle reminders by the instructors instead of harsh 'yelling'.
In the eighties, they resolved to fix Basic Training again. In the nineties.....another new repair job. And a decade ago came what I'd refer to as "Strike Force" training.....making the Air Force appear slightly more Army than the previous Air Force.
To accomplish the new agenda....they needed to roughly two more weeks. This meant more physical challenges....more compound-like scenarios....sandbags...guns....etc.
This all came after 9-11 and the Air Force slowly got drafted into handing young airman, NCOs and junior officers over to ground units in Afghanistan and Iraq. Convoy and guard duty. Not of the jobs fit into the previous Air Force structure or training. So they actually had to invent another class for everyone to attend and learn how to act "Army". I know.....it was fairly amusing. If you wanted to be "Army"......you would have joined the Army.
The generals and chiefs took some criticism and rebuilt Air Force Basic Training into this "Strike Force" idea (my term for it, not theirs).
The odd thing with the two extra weeks added to the training schedule.....not one single extra training was added to the manpower listings. Yeah....it was amazing that they actually accomplished this without any extra help.
Oddly, within five years.....various sandals started to erupt out of Basic Training. Most of it was because instructors were caught doing stupid stuff.
Blame? Well....they eventually decided that there just wasn't enough character-building in boot-camp. So another new fix is being prepared and introduced (the next version of Air Force Basic Training), and it's all about older officers and instructors (not necessarily NCOs) instructing on character-building. The program name? "Capstone".
What CAN you teach in eight to nine weeks to radically change some kid out of high school? Basically, you are asking for the impossible. This might come across to a quarter of the folks there, but the bulk probably need an entire year of character-building.....to have any measurable results. Then the odd thing is that you'd turn those young folks loose onto the corrupted Air Force world and watch them ask stupid questions of older NCOs and officers in general.
I came to a radical point in the 1990s before retiring from the Air Force....where I questioned anyone who said something was 'broke' and needed fixing. I often had found that solutions were often the trigger of a consequence, and actually made a situation much worse than it already was. Rather than revamping an entire program.....if you marginally made one simple change....the effect of the change solved the entire problem. Rather than million-dollar solutions....I came to realize the nickel-solution was often more practical.
The problem with nickel-solutions is that no one gets medals for them or promotion brownie-points. Everyone wants mega changes that revolve around entire new manpower solutions or costly structural changes.
A decade from now.....the Air Force generals and chiefs will meet again....some new scandal....some newly created problem, and fix up another massive change. In forty years....I expect Air Force boot-camp to be an entire year in length. No one will be able to explain why, but they will discover that character-building is not a one-week phase of life introduction. It requires something that classrooms can't deliver upon.
Just my two cents of humble observation.
Saturday, 28 March 2015
Bergdahl's Defense Strategy
Late yesterday, the news folks got ahold of Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl's chief defense strategy. Apparently, he will say in court....that he was intending to get up and go out the front gate.....walking to the nearest Army post nearby.....to report his commander and unit for discipline issues and wrongdoing. He apparently didn't trust his commander or unit, and felt that by going to the next unit down the road.....they'd take his report and actually act upon it.
Somewhere in his thinking....he felt he had sufficient survivor skills to handle this "walk" from his days of youth in Idaho.
The general problem with this defense?
Imagine this scenario with yourself. You are married and live fifteen miles west of Memphis. The nearest cop station is fifteen east of Memphis. A thirty mile distance. Your wife has clobbered you with a bat, dumped all your beer, and even stabbed your shoulder. She took away your car keys and your gun. Your chief priority? Oddly, rather than just walk away or call your buddy to get you, or just apologize for your 'mistake'.....you decide to walk to the cop station thirty miles away....through the heart of Memphis, gang territory, and hoodlum activity. The closer you get to Memphis....the more stupid this idea gets. You do all of this....without a gun in your possession. The odds of making it? Fifty-fifty. Someone will rob you.....assault you.....or kill you before you get to your destination.
Bergdahl wants you to believe that this was a brilliant idea on his part and the only way to solve the situation in the unit. How will a jury of military peers (combat-hardened gentlemen and ladies) take this strategy? It won't work. If he had taken his weapon with him, this suggestion of some 'walk' might come across to two or three members of the jury as possible. But he didn't take his rifle with him. He had no intention of protecting himself once he left the confines of the compound.
By suggesting this.....there's probably another three days of court activity involved because now the whole unit will be examined for minor details and red-flags over their morale and discipline. Rather than making the case against Bergdahl....they now have to investigate the unit itself. The problem will be that almost every single person in the unit will come to the stand and defend the unit, the Sergeant Major, and the Commander. It'll be impossible for Berdahl to find anyone to back-up some part of his gimmick strategy.
The better strategy? Just say you had PTSD and weren't able to comprehend your situation. Maybe half the jury members will buy into this episode.
I won't blame Bergdahl for this strategy....his lawyer is the one pushing on this idea....but if you were up for life in prison, this 'walk' strategy is the weakest idea possible.
Somewhere in his thinking....he felt he had sufficient survivor skills to handle this "walk" from his days of youth in Idaho.
The general problem with this defense?
Imagine this scenario with yourself. You are married and live fifteen miles west of Memphis. The nearest cop station is fifteen east of Memphis. A thirty mile distance. Your wife has clobbered you with a bat, dumped all your beer, and even stabbed your shoulder. She took away your car keys and your gun. Your chief priority? Oddly, rather than just walk away or call your buddy to get you, or just apologize for your 'mistake'.....you decide to walk to the cop station thirty miles away....through the heart of Memphis, gang territory, and hoodlum activity. The closer you get to Memphis....the more stupid this idea gets. You do all of this....without a gun in your possession. The odds of making it? Fifty-fifty. Someone will rob you.....assault you.....or kill you before you get to your destination.
Bergdahl wants you to believe that this was a brilliant idea on his part and the only way to solve the situation in the unit. How will a jury of military peers (combat-hardened gentlemen and ladies) take this strategy? It won't work. If he had taken his weapon with him, this suggestion of some 'walk' might come across to two or three members of the jury as possible. But he didn't take his rifle with him. He had no intention of protecting himself once he left the confines of the compound.
By suggesting this.....there's probably another three days of court activity involved because now the whole unit will be examined for minor details and red-flags over their morale and discipline. Rather than making the case against Bergdahl....they now have to investigate the unit itself. The problem will be that almost every single person in the unit will come to the stand and defend the unit, the Sergeant Major, and the Commander. It'll be impossible for Berdahl to find anyone to back-up some part of his gimmick strategy.
The better strategy? Just say you had PTSD and weren't able to comprehend your situation. Maybe half the jury members will buy into this episode.
I won't blame Bergdahl for this strategy....his lawyer is the one pushing on this idea....but if you were up for life in prison, this 'walk' strategy is the weakest idea possible.
Friday, 27 March 2015
A Bold New and Unsafe World
There's a point in the evolution of society where you can imagine a bunch of children being given a process....a tool....a great step in society, and they simply can't handle it.
This past weekend in Denver....a family came up to Denver (from Tulsa) and were going to have a long ski-week. Somewhere in the midst of this....one member of the family has decided to have an experience with weed...since it's legal now in Colorado.
The young guy (23 years old from what the news folks say)....had a college education and probably was fairly smart....at least on the books.
He ended up buying around $75 of marijuana and edibles.
There are precise written instructions on the packets that you buy. Each is packed into a box or plastic baggy that says each is one unit (10 mg of the active ingredient of marijuana). Then it notes....you need to give it some time (like 60 to 120 minutes). It kinda hints....don't react stupidly and try two or three edibles....expecting a bigger reaction or faster reaction.
With family members around.....the guy does one unit of edibles. He's expecting some high. It's not coming like he expects.
So he does another edible. Nothing. He will do five edibles (five times the normal dose of marijuana). The family simply notes that around an hour later.....he's a bit different. Eventually, the family will leave the hotel and think he just needs some time alone.
He will pull out a pistol and end up shooting himself.
What the local doctors will say is that he 'overdosed' on the edibles.....five times the normal dose.
Toxicology results will be a month away. The authorities will wrap up the death certificate then, and simply note an overdose leading to his own actions.
Generally, one joint is one unit, and one unit is one high. Once we entered into this modern era with all types of possibilities and no legalized control....it was wide-open. A dimwit could walk into a weed-shop....buy a dozen edibles and in two hours find himself in a fallen mental state and deduce the need to kill himself or others over some mental fantasy or worry.
The world is a bit less safe than we'd like to admit.
This past weekend in Denver....a family came up to Denver (from Tulsa) and were going to have a long ski-week. Somewhere in the midst of this....one member of the family has decided to have an experience with weed...since it's legal now in Colorado.
The young guy (23 years old from what the news folks say)....had a college education and probably was fairly smart....at least on the books.
He ended up buying around $75 of marijuana and edibles.
There are precise written instructions on the packets that you buy. Each is packed into a box or plastic baggy that says each is one unit (10 mg of the active ingredient of marijuana). Then it notes....you need to give it some time (like 60 to 120 minutes). It kinda hints....don't react stupidly and try two or three edibles....expecting a bigger reaction or faster reaction.
With family members around.....the guy does one unit of edibles. He's expecting some high. It's not coming like he expects.
So he does another edible. Nothing. He will do five edibles (five times the normal dose of marijuana). The family simply notes that around an hour later.....he's a bit different. Eventually, the family will leave the hotel and think he just needs some time alone.
He will pull out a pistol and end up shooting himself.
What the local doctors will say is that he 'overdosed' on the edibles.....five times the normal dose.
Toxicology results will be a month away. The authorities will wrap up the death certificate then, and simply note an overdose leading to his own actions.
Generally, one joint is one unit, and one unit is one high. Once we entered into this modern era with all types of possibilities and no legalized control....it was wide-open. A dimwit could walk into a weed-shop....buy a dozen edibles and in two hours find himself in a fallen mental state and deduce the need to kill himself or others over some mental fantasy or worry.
The world is a bit less safe than we'd like to admit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)