Maybe if they'd lessened the amount (say instead of 93-percent.....it was 58-percent), then a lot of people would have been more controlled in their anti-enthusiasm of the situation.
The thing is....they lead these people like a herd of cattle to one broad expectation. And in evening hours of election day....that expectation died off.
But I go back to this one central theme.....93-percent. How the hell do you arrive at such a number, and how realistic was it in the first place? Was the act of 5th-grade kids, working with a marginal instructor? Or was this just a wild number they plucked out of the sky?
No comments:
Post a Comment