This past week....the EPA came out with a full report (207 pages) and new rules over wood-burning stoves.
Yeah, wood-burning stoves.
Yeah, actual real wood-burning stoves.
I would strongly recommend that you click above and go through the first dozen pages and note the various graphic charts, statistical analysis, and expert opinion over wood-burning stoves.
For roughly 240 years....America survived without any regulation or such....on wood-burning stoves. Now? Roughly 300 pages of new regulations will come into play.
Who produced the full report (207 pages) on wood stoves? Well, that's an odd thing....there's no names attached to it. No professors, no engineers, no doctors, no PhD folks, and no science folks.
The end of the document does have a number of pages to cite where they gathered their data, which seems to be legit.
Where do you get experts on wood stoves? If I asked my brother, he'd likely lead me over to Sand Mountain or some remote area of Tennessee where folks have a long and distinguished career in wood stoves. They'd cite the best wood to burn....the way to ensure your stove lasts for decades....and how to properly clean it. Respiratory talk? Well....they'd ask how you vented it and if the chimney was properly cleared once a year. Respiratory talk from this report? Oh, there's fancy graphical charts and various talk about bad things that could occur....if you were stupid about hooking it up.
The general problem here? Whoever wrote this.....probably won't appear in public.....nor appear on CNN or the Today Show. It's probably a college professor from California, who has never been in a house with a wood stove in his or her life.
The necessity of government involvement in wood stove management? Why limit it to just this.....why not include out-houses, or home-gardens as well?
Forty years ago.....if you'd been hired by some governmental agency and told to write such a report.....you would have just laughed and walked out of the room. The truth is....we have way too many scientists now standing around with no real job or anything to do, and the government answer is to produce reports like this.
Saturday, 7 February 2015
Bama, Monday, and the Gay Marriage Thing
Come Monday, unless the Supreme Court steps in, Alabama will be put upon to allow gay marriage. No one is sure of anything much. The Supreme Court has shown no tendency to get involved, and just sat back on this issue for a while.
In the state? It's hard to tell the general reaction. If you read most newspapers....there's the anti-gay marriage crowd out in full force, and there's the pro-gay marriage crowd out in full force. Right now, based on news reports....folks are expecting between twenty and fifty couples appearing to get their one-sex marriage license on Monday.
Several state and county judges have said they won't do such a ceremony.....and they indicate that it's not written down to force them to perform such a ceremony. The way to get around the court order? These guys won't do anyone.....not straight couples.....not gay couples....no one.
Bama state law says that anyone who is a resident of the state can apply for a license, and be married in any of the sixty-seven counties. Who can marry you? Any pastor or minister of a recognized religion within the state, or county/state judges (active and retired). How many of such individuals exist? I'd take a guess between six and eight thousand such individuals within the state (four and a half-million residents).
Yeah, we have a fair number of churches in the state. Bama folks openly brag about their churches, their ministers, and their various paths to heaven (even if they do commit sins, drink hard on Saturday evenings, and gamble a bit).
How many judges and ministers will refrain from marrying gay couples? I will guess eighty-percent will find some reason. The participating judges against this....might all just say they won't marry anyone. The ministers? Well....how would you force them? Fed law? Non-existent. State law? Non-existent. Some fed judge just ordering you to do something, without a law to back him up? It'd drag this all out into another bigger mess....if you ask me.
If this went forward.....how many gay couples would be married by the end of 2015? I'd take a humble guess on this, and assume that about 500 such marriages would occur by 1 January 2016. We'd likely peak out this year, and probably see a yearly sum of 250-odd marriages from 2016 on.....with at least fifty gay couples a year getting divorced as we got a year or two into this.
Church acceptance? Being from Bama, I'd say two or three religions would have zero problems with this. The bulk of the rest would find folks pretty focused on "no"....firing ministers who suggested that they move on, and getting deacons drawn into chat forums that just didn't get any real solution on the table. You might find a dozen-odd religions who could be drawn into a long debate and locals either accept the idea or leave the participation of the church. 2015 might be one of those years when some churches find themselves with only half the membership that they had last year....because of their stand for gay marriage or stand against gay marriage.
On the religious view.....I'd take a guess that a handful of newly created religions will come to exist....with modern topics fully accepted by the minister and his deacons. Yeah, you might have a pro-gay marriage church.....fully supportive of marijuana....approving of various lifestyles (bondage or freaky piercings) that most Bama folks frown upon and able to support a membership roll of forty-four members.
I'd take a guess that the local newspaper from my home county on Monday...will have one reporter standing there at the county clerk's window all day.....waiting for one single gay couple to appear and get noted in the newspaper as the first such couple in Lauderdale county. Oddly, right behind the noted and highly reported couple will be another couple....some guy in his mid-thirties and a fifteen-year old gal who has mama's permission to marry Conrad (the local goat enthusiast). It might be a better story to tell....mid-thirties guy and a fifteen year old wife....a local goat farm family to be.....but the big focus would be on Misty and Candy (two Burger King employees) who are both forty years old and of one particular sex. If you ask me.....no one much will care about the two lesbians getting married and would prefer to hear about the goat farmer and his teenage wife.
Well....it's all good, as we say in Bama. Marriages come and go, churches hire and fire ministers, and political folks fall into significant scandals on a weekly basis within the state. Life goes on.
In the state? It's hard to tell the general reaction. If you read most newspapers....there's the anti-gay marriage crowd out in full force, and there's the pro-gay marriage crowd out in full force. Right now, based on news reports....folks are expecting between twenty and fifty couples appearing to get their one-sex marriage license on Monday.
Several state and county judges have said they won't do such a ceremony.....and they indicate that it's not written down to force them to perform such a ceremony. The way to get around the court order? These guys won't do anyone.....not straight couples.....not gay couples....no one.
Bama state law says that anyone who is a resident of the state can apply for a license, and be married in any of the sixty-seven counties. Who can marry you? Any pastor or minister of a recognized religion within the state, or county/state judges (active and retired). How many of such individuals exist? I'd take a guess between six and eight thousand such individuals within the state (four and a half-million residents).
Yeah, we have a fair number of churches in the state. Bama folks openly brag about their churches, their ministers, and their various paths to heaven (even if they do commit sins, drink hard on Saturday evenings, and gamble a bit).
How many judges and ministers will refrain from marrying gay couples? I will guess eighty-percent will find some reason. The participating judges against this....might all just say they won't marry anyone. The ministers? Well....how would you force them? Fed law? Non-existent. State law? Non-existent. Some fed judge just ordering you to do something, without a law to back him up? It'd drag this all out into another bigger mess....if you ask me.
If this went forward.....how many gay couples would be married by the end of 2015? I'd take a humble guess on this, and assume that about 500 such marriages would occur by 1 January 2016. We'd likely peak out this year, and probably see a yearly sum of 250-odd marriages from 2016 on.....with at least fifty gay couples a year getting divorced as we got a year or two into this.
Church acceptance? Being from Bama, I'd say two or three religions would have zero problems with this. The bulk of the rest would find folks pretty focused on "no"....firing ministers who suggested that they move on, and getting deacons drawn into chat forums that just didn't get any real solution on the table. You might find a dozen-odd religions who could be drawn into a long debate and locals either accept the idea or leave the participation of the church. 2015 might be one of those years when some churches find themselves with only half the membership that they had last year....because of their stand for gay marriage or stand against gay marriage.
On the religious view.....I'd take a guess that a handful of newly created religions will come to exist....with modern topics fully accepted by the minister and his deacons. Yeah, you might have a pro-gay marriage church.....fully supportive of marijuana....approving of various lifestyles (bondage or freaky piercings) that most Bama folks frown upon and able to support a membership roll of forty-four members.
I'd take a guess that the local newspaper from my home county on Monday...will have one reporter standing there at the county clerk's window all day.....waiting for one single gay couple to appear and get noted in the newspaper as the first such couple in Lauderdale county. Oddly, right behind the noted and highly reported couple will be another couple....some guy in his mid-thirties and a fifteen-year old gal who has mama's permission to marry Conrad (the local goat enthusiast). It might be a better story to tell....mid-thirties guy and a fifteen year old wife....a local goat farm family to be.....but the big focus would be on Misty and Candy (two Burger King employees) who are both forty years old and of one particular sex. If you ask me.....no one much will care about the two lesbians getting married and would prefer to hear about the goat farmer and his teenage wife.
Well....it's all good, as we say in Bama. Marriages come and go, churches hire and fire ministers, and political folks fall into significant scandals on a weekly basis within the state. Life goes on.
Friday, 6 February 2015
Harper Lee and A Second Book
Alabama has a lot of four-star writers....and maybe a couple of five-star writers.
Winston Groom (Forrest Gump), Truman Capote (well, yeah, he was born in New Orleans....but moved to Monroeville and became a Bama writer), Dennis Covington (he wrote the Sand Mountain murder piece), Zelda Fitzgerald (she was married to F. Scott and was a bit crazy, but in Bama....it's an accepted thing to be eccentric), and then we had Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird).
If you live in central Bama and have any passion for great literature.....you read Harper Lee's book. It's been in production since 1960 and probably rated one of the top twenty books ever produced in America.
The amazing thing about Harper Lee....is that she wrapped up the book in 1960 and never wrote another book, period. Folks are a bit amazed about this side of the story. Imagine Mark Twain just writing Huck Finn and walking away. Or imagine John Steinbeck just writing Tortilla Flats alone and by itself.
This past week, word got out that a new book would be published by Harper Lee. She's getting up around ninety years old and this announcement was a bit of a shock.
What she says....via the publisher....is that she wrote a book prior to To Kill a Mockingbird and sent a draft to the publisher in NY City....who kinda liked it but asked....do you have anything else? She went back....spent a couple of months on another book, and sent them To Kill a Mockingbird. They loved it and published it.
The first book? What's told to the public is that Harper Lee's manuscript ended up with her sister (a lawyer) and was kept in her private practice there in Monroeville. The sister didn't ever say nothing. The publisher never came to ask for the first draft back and publish it. Nothing was spoken of the first book....ever.
The sister died in the past six months. The associate in the office of the sister was cleaning out her files, and came across the book. Relatives taking care of Harper Lee....noted the new document and asked the publisher about it. The publisher was eager to publish it and it'll be out by mid-summer.
Frankly, upon hearing the whole story.....I generally think it's all bogus.
What most folks say currently of Harper Lee is that she's not too well off physically, and they always want you to know that she's pretty sharp and full of wit. Based on comments from the funeral of the sister from several folks....they aren't that sure of her wit or sharpness still being there. Maybe she did write this new book.....Go Set a Watchman....but I have my doubts.
For years, it's been suggested that Harper had some assistance by Truman Capote (a high school friend) to write To Kill a Mockingbird. There's no real proof to say yes or no on this. And you will have to wonder if the same folks will suggest this with this second novel.
My sense of logic kicks in with this whole thing.....a person sits down and writes one of the best novels of the century, and never produces anything again? It's hard to think in these terms of such a writer.
Edgar Allen Poe wrote tons of short stories....but when you go looking for a full-up book....there's only one single book that he wrote.
Oscar Wilde wrote tons of poetry....but there's only one single book that he produced....The Picture of Dorian Grey.
Margret Mitchell wrote only Gone With the Wind.....deciding to never write another piece, and died a couple years later at age forty-nine after getting hit by a car.
Boris Pasternak wrote Doctor Zhivago.....winning the Nobel Prize for Literature on just one book.....and never published again.
So, there are single book writers. But it's awful hard to find such an individual. Maybe Harper Lee's story is true....but it's just hard to believe it. Bottom line.....you will get one more piece of work, which got turned down for publication fifty-odd years ago. You might want to ask why.
Winston Groom (Forrest Gump), Truman Capote (well, yeah, he was born in New Orleans....but moved to Monroeville and became a Bama writer), Dennis Covington (he wrote the Sand Mountain murder piece), Zelda Fitzgerald (she was married to F. Scott and was a bit crazy, but in Bama....it's an accepted thing to be eccentric), and then we had Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird).
If you live in central Bama and have any passion for great literature.....you read Harper Lee's book. It's been in production since 1960 and probably rated one of the top twenty books ever produced in America.
The amazing thing about Harper Lee....is that she wrapped up the book in 1960 and never wrote another book, period. Folks are a bit amazed about this side of the story. Imagine Mark Twain just writing Huck Finn and walking away. Or imagine John Steinbeck just writing Tortilla Flats alone and by itself.
This past week, word got out that a new book would be published by Harper Lee. She's getting up around ninety years old and this announcement was a bit of a shock.
What she says....via the publisher....is that she wrote a book prior to To Kill a Mockingbird and sent a draft to the publisher in NY City....who kinda liked it but asked....do you have anything else? She went back....spent a couple of months on another book, and sent them To Kill a Mockingbird. They loved it and published it.
The first book? What's told to the public is that Harper Lee's manuscript ended up with her sister (a lawyer) and was kept in her private practice there in Monroeville. The sister didn't ever say nothing. The publisher never came to ask for the first draft back and publish it. Nothing was spoken of the first book....ever.
The sister died in the past six months. The associate in the office of the sister was cleaning out her files, and came across the book. Relatives taking care of Harper Lee....noted the new document and asked the publisher about it. The publisher was eager to publish it and it'll be out by mid-summer.
Frankly, upon hearing the whole story.....I generally think it's all bogus.
What most folks say currently of Harper Lee is that she's not too well off physically, and they always want you to know that she's pretty sharp and full of wit. Based on comments from the funeral of the sister from several folks....they aren't that sure of her wit or sharpness still being there. Maybe she did write this new book.....Go Set a Watchman....but I have my doubts.
For years, it's been suggested that Harper had some assistance by Truman Capote (a high school friend) to write To Kill a Mockingbird. There's no real proof to say yes or no on this. And you will have to wonder if the same folks will suggest this with this second novel.
My sense of logic kicks in with this whole thing.....a person sits down and writes one of the best novels of the century, and never produces anything again? It's hard to think in these terms of such a writer.
Edgar Allen Poe wrote tons of short stories....but when you go looking for a full-up book....there's only one single book that he wrote.
Oscar Wilde wrote tons of poetry....but there's only one single book that he produced....The Picture of Dorian Grey.
Margret Mitchell wrote only Gone With the Wind.....deciding to never write another piece, and died a couple years later at age forty-nine after getting hit by a car.
Boris Pasternak wrote Doctor Zhivago.....winning the Nobel Prize for Literature on just one book.....and never published again.
So, there are single book writers. But it's awful hard to find such an individual. Maybe Harper Lee's story is true....but it's just hard to believe it. Bottom line.....you will get one more piece of work, which got turned down for publication fifty-odd years ago. You might want to ask why.
Thursday, 5 February 2015
The Illusion of Free Will
Sometimes, a cartoon sticks out in my mind. Yesterday, I came across a single Delbert piece..."free will is an illusion anyway", and the response was correct ("Well, if it isn't, it will be").
I took a number of college classes which I basically regard as worthless. The Air Force paid for them and they were all regarded as part of the path toward some degree, which I'd say today was worthless as well. There were three or four classes which I note as thoughtful, demanding an open prospective of life, and probably made me a better person in life.
One of those classes was a class in logic. I admit.....it was taught by a nutcase Italian guy at a local community college in Tacoma, Washington. His English was marginal and he had some class arrangement with another "real" college in Tacoma (Pacific Lutheran University) and he supplementing his situation with an evening class via the community college.
We opened the evening with a mathematical type situation....where you basically had one's and zero's. One meant logical, and zero meant illogical. After two hours of class, I walked out....amazed by the simple introduction of logic. I admit his English in turbo-Italian-accent was awful....but he simply got the point across.
To be kinda honest....over the next ten-odd weeks....we'd have class and it was more of a discussion over what could be logical and what would be illogical. No exams....no tests......no real homework. Just some guy talking at length over situations in life. One of the scenarios one evening got around to free well. Numerous examples were put up where logic would dictate that choices were always an element of free well. As long as you had choices....you believed in the statement of a free-will situation. If you only had one choice.....logic would kick in and you'd assume no free-will. Then he injected as we came to the close of the evening....what if you simply perceived choices existing but they weren't really there, and thus inviting the question....would there still be free-will?
Logic would kick in. But he simply ended the class on that question.
Remarkably....the entire semester of introduction to logic via this community college professor....with no test, no exam and no homework. Full credit, just for showing up. But this was one of the few classes that made you sit and ponder over statements.
With the cartoon shown above, the statement is correct. Free will is an illusion. As long as you believe it.....you will continue on your merry way and never question things. Once the illusion is demonstrated.....your trust in free existing will always be dragged up and you will remain skeptical of things for the remainder of your life. That's the logical step which you can't avoid.
Sadly, the skeptics group grows every year.
I took a number of college classes which I basically regard as worthless. The Air Force paid for them and they were all regarded as part of the path toward some degree, which I'd say today was worthless as well. There were three or four classes which I note as thoughtful, demanding an open prospective of life, and probably made me a better person in life.
One of those classes was a class in logic. I admit.....it was taught by a nutcase Italian guy at a local community college in Tacoma, Washington. His English was marginal and he had some class arrangement with another "real" college in Tacoma (Pacific Lutheran University) and he supplementing his situation with an evening class via the community college.
We opened the evening with a mathematical type situation....where you basically had one's and zero's. One meant logical, and zero meant illogical. After two hours of class, I walked out....amazed by the simple introduction of logic. I admit his English in turbo-Italian-accent was awful....but he simply got the point across.
To be kinda honest....over the next ten-odd weeks....we'd have class and it was more of a discussion over what could be logical and what would be illogical. No exams....no tests......no real homework. Just some guy talking at length over situations in life. One of the scenarios one evening got around to free well. Numerous examples were put up where logic would dictate that choices were always an element of free well. As long as you had choices....you believed in the statement of a free-will situation. If you only had one choice.....logic would kick in and you'd assume no free-will. Then he injected as we came to the close of the evening....what if you simply perceived choices existing but they weren't really there, and thus inviting the question....would there still be free-will?
Logic would kick in. But he simply ended the class on that question.
Remarkably....the entire semester of introduction to logic via this community college professor....with no test, no exam and no homework. Full credit, just for showing up. But this was one of the few classes that made you sit and ponder over statements.
With the cartoon shown above, the statement is correct. Free will is an illusion. As long as you believe it.....you will continue on your merry way and never question things. Once the illusion is demonstrated.....your trust in free existing will always be dragged up and you will remain skeptical of things for the remainder of your life. That's the logical step which you can't avoid.
Sadly, the skeptics group grows every year.
Wednesday, 4 February 2015
Jury Duty
My dad, after his retirement from the post office, would bring up jury duty occasionally as I came to visit. He was always hopeful he'd end up on the list and be pulling a couple times a year of jury duty. As far as I know......his name never came up. That's the deal with most retired guys......all their life, they've been too busy or wound-up on real work, and now....they got time for such curious episodes.
My brother pointed out to me once....when you get called up for such duty.....they ask you some questions. Both prosecutors and defense attorneys hate smart guys.....especially engineer-types....on the jury. These are the guys who ask stupid questions why fact #12 conflicts entirely with fact #22, so logically, neither can be true.
From what I've read.....housewives are always the better pick, because they don't think too much over facts.
Today, I was glancing through the seventy-odd news sources I go to each day, and came to this one odd story about this nutcase shooter guy from Aurora (the theater shooter, Holmes). Case is ready for a jury to sit and hear it.
So, here's one candidate for the jury....who kinda went nuts as they asked some general questions....falling to the floor and pulling a heaping amount of her hair out. The judge kinda waved for some deputy to escort her out. I'm guessing the mental health unit in town got called and she might be sitting there for a long while.
Meanwhile.....jury selection continued. One of the guys pulled for questions....showed some indications of being doped up (it is legal to smoke weed in Colorado)....so there's not much that the judge can say....except to dismiss the guy.
In years to come, it might be hard to find twelve jury members who stay pure for eight hours a day....without any weed.
The judge went through some other guys.....noting two of them were fairly intoxicated and dismissed them. One reporter noted a sick person in the group who either fainted or felt ill....causing an ambulance to come....to tote them off.
I'm guessing the judge is sitting there tonight.....thinking of the mess of getting a semi-cohesive jury in place and hope they can do the job. But, just getting a dozen folks and a few sprares....who appear sane and able to handle day-to-day stress....might be near impossible to achieve.
My brother pointed out to me once....when you get called up for such duty.....they ask you some questions. Both prosecutors and defense attorneys hate smart guys.....especially engineer-types....on the jury. These are the guys who ask stupid questions why fact #12 conflicts entirely with fact #22, so logically, neither can be true.
From what I've read.....housewives are always the better pick, because they don't think too much over facts.
Today, I was glancing through the seventy-odd news sources I go to each day, and came to this one odd story about this nutcase shooter guy from Aurora (the theater shooter, Holmes). Case is ready for a jury to sit and hear it.
So, here's one candidate for the jury....who kinda went nuts as they asked some general questions....falling to the floor and pulling a heaping amount of her hair out. The judge kinda waved for some deputy to escort her out. I'm guessing the mental health unit in town got called and she might be sitting there for a long while.
Meanwhile.....jury selection continued. One of the guys pulled for questions....showed some indications of being doped up (it is legal to smoke weed in Colorado)....so there's not much that the judge can say....except to dismiss the guy.
In years to come, it might be hard to find twelve jury members who stay pure for eight hours a day....without any weed.
The judge went through some other guys.....noting two of them were fairly intoxicated and dismissed them. One reporter noted a sick person in the group who either fainted or felt ill....causing an ambulance to come....to tote them off.
I'm guessing the judge is sitting there tonight.....thinking of the mess of getting a semi-cohesive jury in place and hope they can do the job. But, just getting a dozen folks and a few sprares....who appear sane and able to handle day-to-day stress....might be near impossible to achieve.
Monday, 2 February 2015
The Magic Invisibility School Suspension
If you ever drive out in west Texas.....getting anywhere west of Odessa or Midland.....you tend to note the local conditions and scenic views (lacking of any whatsoever). There are a few towns here and there.....a gas station, some Dollar-General stores, and some cattle ranches.
Generally, you say cattle outnumber people by a twenty to one ratio (my humble numbers).
About fifty miles west of Odessa is Kermit. There's nothing much historic over the town of six-thousand folks. State highway 115 and 302 run through the town. There's a big Pentecostal Church at the north end of town. Somewhere in the middle are a Sonic burger franchise and a Dairy Queen operation. There's a cafe or two, along with a couple of gas stations. If you wanted Wal-Mart shopping....you'd have to drive ten miles east of the town to West Odessa....to get that kind of experience.
Does the Pentecostal thing matter much.....as I mentioned it in the previous paragraph? Well....yeah.
This past week.....news got out of Kermit that the school had a problem to develop.
I'll try to tell the story in a simple fashion. Some kid came up in school....nine years old....and he's a bit of a devious character. You'd just say he's the type that just wants to have some fun.
The kid came into school one day with a ring. He noted to his buddies that it was a "One-Ring".....which is the ring that came out of J R R Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. You know.....the one that made a guy invisible. He noted to his associate that this ring had the secondary power of allowing the guy wearing it....to make others invisible. Naturally, he wanted to intimidate his associate, and hinted that he'd make that kid invisible.
The other kid got all upset and peeved about this impending doom of him being invisible.....so he ran off and ratted on his associate to school management.
The kid with the ring? Oh, he got suspended for a week apparently. His dad noted in response to a local newspaper question on this.....noted that if his son did turn the kid invisible....he also had the power to turn the kid right back to visible.
Now, you'd typically pause over this kind of thing. You'd wonder if folks in Kermit had ever watched Lord of the Rings and grasped that it was simply a fantasy story over good folks battling evil folks....all imaginary of course.
In general, at least around the hardcore Pentecostal folks.....there are some things accepted and forbidden. Movies are forbidden by a number of ministers within the faith....so when you start yacking about some new dragon movie, or Bruce Lee-Kong Fu flick, or some Burt Reynolds car chase movie......well....folks don't really perk up much because they may have seen it but just can't admit this in public.
Having a TV? Generally accepted although what you watch is important....like the news and weather are OK. Episodes of Andy Griffith are Ok. Buffy the Vampire Killer probably won't be approved for viewing within the crew. I doubt that Bewitched would even be acceptable.
Rings and jewelry? Well.....no. Marriage rings are even frowned upon and accepted only when folks get real peppy about it. Just suggesting that you might have a One-Ring (from Lord of the Rings) would likely disturb a forty-year old gal deeply.
Some Pentecostal folks are against organized sports. If you just meet and conduct a local softball game.....that's Ok. NFL football might be deemed inappropriate and only watched in your basement and behind closed doors....if your minister is peppy on the topic.
Some groups from the Pentecostal folks....have a strong rule on their women wearing skirts....mandating it below the knee. Some folks get peppy about men going shirtless.
So, in this small town of Kermit.....you can imagine a fair number of folks there being Pentecostal, and this kid with the Lord of the Ring's ring.....getting a fair amount of attention. Wizard-stuff.....stuff that Satan might bring into their small town.....and worries about invisible people. You just can't have that sort of stuff.
Yeah.....that's the basic story. I know.....it's pretty stupid.....but this is West Texas, and things are pretty anchored down in life. It's a good thing the kid didn't say anything about the fire-breathing dragon that his dad keeps in the garage, or the big stone in the backyard with a Merlin-sword sticking into it. All this kind of talk would disturb some folks.
Generally, you say cattle outnumber people by a twenty to one ratio (my humble numbers).
About fifty miles west of Odessa is Kermit. There's nothing much historic over the town of six-thousand folks. State highway 115 and 302 run through the town. There's a big Pentecostal Church at the north end of town. Somewhere in the middle are a Sonic burger franchise and a Dairy Queen operation. There's a cafe or two, along with a couple of gas stations. If you wanted Wal-Mart shopping....you'd have to drive ten miles east of the town to West Odessa....to get that kind of experience.
Does the Pentecostal thing matter much.....as I mentioned it in the previous paragraph? Well....yeah.
This past week.....news got out of Kermit that the school had a problem to develop.
I'll try to tell the story in a simple fashion. Some kid came up in school....nine years old....and he's a bit of a devious character. You'd just say he's the type that just wants to have some fun.
The kid came into school one day with a ring. He noted to his buddies that it was a "One-Ring".....which is the ring that came out of J R R Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. You know.....the one that made a guy invisible. He noted to his associate that this ring had the secondary power of allowing the guy wearing it....to make others invisible. Naturally, he wanted to intimidate his associate, and hinted that he'd make that kid invisible.
The other kid got all upset and peeved about this impending doom of him being invisible.....so he ran off and ratted on his associate to school management.
The kid with the ring? Oh, he got suspended for a week apparently. His dad noted in response to a local newspaper question on this.....noted that if his son did turn the kid invisible....he also had the power to turn the kid right back to visible.
Now, you'd typically pause over this kind of thing. You'd wonder if folks in Kermit had ever watched Lord of the Rings and grasped that it was simply a fantasy story over good folks battling evil folks....all imaginary of course.
In general, at least around the hardcore Pentecostal folks.....there are some things accepted and forbidden. Movies are forbidden by a number of ministers within the faith....so when you start yacking about some new dragon movie, or Bruce Lee-Kong Fu flick, or some Burt Reynolds car chase movie......well....folks don't really perk up much because they may have seen it but just can't admit this in public.
Having a TV? Generally accepted although what you watch is important....like the news and weather are OK. Episodes of Andy Griffith are Ok. Buffy the Vampire Killer probably won't be approved for viewing within the crew. I doubt that Bewitched would even be acceptable.
Rings and jewelry? Well.....no. Marriage rings are even frowned upon and accepted only when folks get real peppy about it. Just suggesting that you might have a One-Ring (from Lord of the Rings) would likely disturb a forty-year old gal deeply.
Some Pentecostal folks are against organized sports. If you just meet and conduct a local softball game.....that's Ok. NFL football might be deemed inappropriate and only watched in your basement and behind closed doors....if your minister is peppy on the topic.
Some groups from the Pentecostal folks....have a strong rule on their women wearing skirts....mandating it below the knee. Some folks get peppy about men going shirtless.
So, in this small town of Kermit.....you can imagine a fair number of folks there being Pentecostal, and this kid with the Lord of the Ring's ring.....getting a fair amount of attention. Wizard-stuff.....stuff that Satan might bring into their small town.....and worries about invisible people. You just can't have that sort of stuff.
Yeah.....that's the basic story. I know.....it's pretty stupid.....but this is West Texas, and things are pretty anchored down in life. It's a good thing the kid didn't say anything about the fire-breathing dragon that his dad keeps in the garage, or the big stone in the backyard with a Merlin-sword sticking into it. All this kind of talk would disturb some folks.
Sunday, 1 February 2015
A Draft Law in Progress
Down in Texas over the last week or two....the political guys have been busy. They decided that there just isn't enough protection for teachers in the classroom. So, they've crafted this bill, which basically says a teacher will have the fundamental right of self-protection in the classroom, and can take down (in the literal sense, shoot-to-kill) any punk who threatens the teacher or their students.
Naturally, there are some folks who are a bit peeved. There's a question-mark if it'll pass, and bigger questions will arise later when some punk kid does something stupid to threaten harm of a severe nature on someone, and Ms Jenkins pulls out a pistol and shoots them. The kid's parents will sue and claim it wasn't right....and some Texas judge will have to determine the circumstances which the law would be effective. Supreme Court episode? I'm guessing in less than five years....it'll come up.
In the 1960s and 1970s....a kid was mostly smart enough to realize the impact of stupidity. You might do one stupid act and get suspended for three days, which meant you had to explain to the parents why you were that stupid. If you really crossed the line.....you were suspended from the school for that school year. This typically meant you had to find another school to accept you or wait a year to re-enter the old school. We had three kids who came over to my school in the final three years I attended....who were suspended from regional schools nearby. It was a harsh deal of reality for them.
Generally, I'm of the mind that you need a half-day orientation class for each kid who gets past the 5th grade. You do it on day three or four of the new school-year. The theme for the three-hour episode is stupidity. If you think you are stupid enough.....here's what we will do to you. Share the theme with their parents and emphasize the line drawn out. Then as each kid crosses the line....finish them off with a minimum of one day of school lost. Any suggestion of physical violence? Make them attend a sand-bag filling seminar at the gym.....fill up three-hundred sand-bags and then you get a chance back in the class.
It's hard to imagine where we were forty years ago, and where we stand today. You rely on some marginal math teacher, who can barely teach.....to be the defender of your kid in school. Somewhere in the mix.....you are hoping that this old battleaxe of a teacher who is nearly sixty-five and retirement.....has a pistol in her purse and will easily take on any threat to her kids in the classroom. Priorities here.....are a bit different.
Naturally, there are some folks who are a bit peeved. There's a question-mark if it'll pass, and bigger questions will arise later when some punk kid does something stupid to threaten harm of a severe nature on someone, and Ms Jenkins pulls out a pistol and shoots them. The kid's parents will sue and claim it wasn't right....and some Texas judge will have to determine the circumstances which the law would be effective. Supreme Court episode? I'm guessing in less than five years....it'll come up.
In the 1960s and 1970s....a kid was mostly smart enough to realize the impact of stupidity. You might do one stupid act and get suspended for three days, which meant you had to explain to the parents why you were that stupid. If you really crossed the line.....you were suspended from the school for that school year. This typically meant you had to find another school to accept you or wait a year to re-enter the old school. We had three kids who came over to my school in the final three years I attended....who were suspended from regional schools nearby. It was a harsh deal of reality for them.
Generally, I'm of the mind that you need a half-day orientation class for each kid who gets past the 5th grade. You do it on day three or four of the new school-year. The theme for the three-hour episode is stupidity. If you think you are stupid enough.....here's what we will do to you. Share the theme with their parents and emphasize the line drawn out. Then as each kid crosses the line....finish them off with a minimum of one day of school lost. Any suggestion of physical violence? Make them attend a sand-bag filling seminar at the gym.....fill up three-hundred sand-bags and then you get a chance back in the class.
It's hard to imagine where we were forty years ago, and where we stand today. You rely on some marginal math teacher, who can barely teach.....to be the defender of your kid in school. Somewhere in the mix.....you are hoping that this old battleaxe of a teacher who is nearly sixty-five and retirement.....has a pistol in her purse and will easily take on any threat to her kids in the classroom. Priorities here.....are a bit different.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
