Ending of Jason

 This week, General Hospital (the soap) fired one of it's guys.....Steve Burton (plays Jason Morgan).  Reason?  No Covid vaccination.

How I would have handled this?

I would have written up a parting-week, where the character Jason Morgan got Covid, and got taken to a fake ICU.....all messed up on health.

Throughout the week....I would have had Nurse Greta show up and weep....over her secret affair with Jason....then I would have had trampy 'Wendy' show up to weep over her secret lover, and then I would have had Jason's ex-wife Maggie show up and whisper 'screw you' over and over....hating him for leaving her for Bob (his bi-friend).

Around day four, I would have introduced Wong-Wong as a new nurse from Wuhan, who has arrived to save Jason.....mostly giving him oriental herbs and putting mustard on his tongue.

On Friday, Jason would have died, and then some fed doctor would have shown up to save if he'd just taken the vaccination he would have survived. 

Finally, I'd bring in President Biden for a 2-minute chat.....remembering Jason as a guy he'd see on the train each day.....going home from Washington DC, and he was a fine guy....who had great taste in lusty women, and the world weeps over his stupidity in not getting vax'ed up.

In the final moments....a new guy would have arrived on the street.....Jason's third cousin.....Marvin....who is fully vax'ed and is mostly a male model who hooks up with trailer-trash women.  

The Thing About Bail

 Lot of hype this week over bail conditions in various states.

If you stand back and review the landscape.....bail was the tool to ensure 'Joe', who'd done some pretty bad stuff....would return to court on X-day to face a judge.  

If you ended bail (which is going on nationally in various states)....the odds of 'Joe' coming to the judge?  No one publishes data, but I doubt if 'Joe' pays attention to this matters, and just disappears.

Personally, it'd make sense to avoid bail for non-violent and non-drug 'Joes'.  But the minute you start talking about assault or serious drug cases....you need serious bail to get their attention.  

Trying to make this a black/white issue?  Where in the Constitution is there some dividing line?  Show me.  

AOIMSG?

 This week, the Pentagon did a re-organization of the UFO hunter crowd....renaming it 'Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group' and making it a joint group (not Navy as in the previous program).....so Army and Air Force folks are 'invited' to participate.

Why reorg?  I think the Navy took it as far as they possibly could, and it needs a more broad approach.  

The name 'Synchronization' in this?  I've pondered over this for several days.  In the old days....it meant you took several programs and merged them....sometimes with success....sometimes creating a massive failure.

The chance that some general was given the reins and he just wanted "S" in the middle of AOIM*G?  Well....yeah, there are Air Force officers who would do this to have 'MSG' at the end of the term (pretty silly but possible).

As for what happens now?  Years ago, 1980s.....the Air Force sat down and designed an exercise for Europe.  The gimmick?  They wanted to arrange x-number of NATO aircraft in a pattern that would come from several locations and meet over West Germany for a brief five minutes....to see what the Soviets would do.  Stupid?  On a massive scale, and about two weeks after this idea was put up on the board....it was removed as a 'test'.  Too many people would have freaked out and some crazy crap might have occurred.

It wouldn't shock me if these AOIMSG guys finally sat down and designed a test like this and caught the UFO guys in a net where they can't turn in any direction without a full signature of their action....with satellites and collection gear maxed out.  

Marvs-9 (the alien dude)?  He's sitting there and probably speculating on these guys.  You really don't want to be the first alien caught by those stupid Earthlings.  

All of this leading to something caught in a 'net'?  Well....maybe.  

This Brooks Character From Waukesha

 Three observations:

1.  For twenty-odd years (probably going back to his teen years)....this guy has been a drugged-up character.  In the past decade, I doubt if there's a single day that passed....that he didn't do some type of drug.  He was unhappy with life.  He was not achieving much of anything.  The drugs deaden the pain of that miserable existence.

2.  The twenty-plus pages of charges over the years?  The serious ones were negotiated down by prosecutors to get him the lowest amount of time in prison/jail.  If any one of the DA's had done their legal duty....he'd probably done real time in jail.  

3.  The next month for him in jail will be rough....without any drug access.  Might be the first time in 20 years that he went an entire week without drugs.  

Observations

 1.  News crew in Oakland was going out to cover a story....with a security guy accompanying them.  Friendly group came up upon them, and shot/wounded the security guard.  Signs of Mogadishu?  Inside the urban zones of SF and LA, it's just not that safe anymore.

2.  The German Euthanasia Association (there to help you end your suffering) has now said that they won't help you unless you are vaccinated for Covid.  The fact that you will be dead within a period of time with them helping you.....is a bit amazing.  

3.  After Hillary Clinton made her comment that we should all double down and be appreciative of Joe Biden's accomplishments as President....made me try to remember anything she did as Secretary of State for four years.  It must have been a very remarkable period, but I can't remember anything of the period.

4.  New shortage: Alcohol.  Dailywire reports that some states are reporting a shortage on hard alcohol.  Beer?  No.  

Joe's Ten Months

 My description of the past ten months?

If there was a rat problem at the White House....of ten possible solutions (even bringing in a dozen cats as one)....he will go to solution number eleven, thus increasing and doubling the rat problem.

I can't recall people being like this....that stumble from crisis to crisis, and mostly offer solutions that drag a problem out to a further distance, or make the problem even worse.

If you had a farmer like this....he'd be out-of-business in a single year.

If you had a chief of police like this.....he might linger around for a year or two, but be dragged into the mayor's office weekly for a discussion about screw-ups.

So none of this makes much sense.  The crew around him?  They have to be mostly dimwits or marginalized college students who got a meaningless degree.

This is usually where some boss would step in....thump a guy hard on correcting his mistakes, and give the guy a month to clean up his act, or be let go.  Presently, we've got three years of this to go.

Harris?  She can't say a word.  I don't think Joe would accept any advice from her.  The rest of the cabinet?  Losers.  When you needed competence out of Mayor Pete.....you found he was sitting at home on 'rest'.  

So, just settle back.  

How The Rittenhouse Case on President Biden Will Go?

 Just a humble opinion. 

Shortly after Christmas, I expect a defamation lawsuit to be started President Biden for his comments accusing Rittenhouse of being a 'white supremist'.

Amount?  I would suggest in the range of $10-million, with a personal apology issued from the White House.

CNN and the crew wilf laugh over the situation, and somewhere around March....two big-name lawyers will be hired by President Biden.

Some amount of $25,000 will be offered to Rittenhouse to just shut up and drop the case.

Along the end of 2022, I expect the President to be worried over the incoming Republican majority in the House, and expect Joe's team to offer around $100,000.  The case will end early 2023.....Rittenhouse winning and being awarded the $10-million.

Impeachment burden?  This will be added to the list.  

As for where the money will come from?  Well...Hunter, of course.  This will trigger a House review of just how much money that Joe has siphoned off Hunter over the past decade, and the tax implications.