Lot of hype this week over bail conditions in various states.
If you stand back and review the landscape.....bail was the tool to ensure 'Joe', who'd done some pretty bad stuff....would return to court on X-day to face a judge.
If you ended bail (which is going on nationally in various states)....the odds of 'Joe' coming to the judge? No one publishes data, but I doubt if 'Joe' pays attention to this matters, and just disappears.
Personally, it'd make sense to avoid bail for non-violent and non-drug 'Joes'. But the minute you start talking about assault or serious drug cases....you need serious bail to get their attention.
Trying to make this a black/white issue? Where in the Constitution is there some dividing line? Show me.
No comments:
Post a Comment