AOIMSG?

 This week, the Pentagon did a re-organization of the UFO hunter crowd....renaming it 'Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group' and making it a joint group (not Navy as in the previous program).....so Army and Air Force folks are 'invited' to participate.

Why reorg?  I think the Navy took it as far as they possibly could, and it needs a more broad approach.  

The name 'Synchronization' in this?  I've pondered over this for several days.  In the old days....it meant you took several programs and merged them....sometimes with success....sometimes creating a massive failure.

The chance that some general was given the reins and he just wanted "S" in the middle of AOIM*G?  Well....yeah, there are Air Force officers who would do this to have 'MSG' at the end of the term (pretty silly but possible).

As for what happens now?  Years ago, 1980s.....the Air Force sat down and designed an exercise for Europe.  The gimmick?  They wanted to arrange x-number of NATO aircraft in a pattern that would come from several locations and meet over West Germany for a brief five minutes....to see what the Soviets would do.  Stupid?  On a massive scale, and about two weeks after this idea was put up on the board....it was removed as a 'test'.  Too many people would have freaked out and some crazy crap might have occurred.

It wouldn't shock me if these AOIMSG guys finally sat down and designed a test like this and caught the UFO guys in a net where they can't turn in any direction without a full signature of their action....with satellites and collection gear maxed out.  

Marvs-9 (the alien dude)?  He's sitting there and probably speculating on these guys.  You really don't want to be the first alien caught by those stupid Earthlings.  

All of this leading to something caught in a 'net'?  Well....maybe.  

This Brooks Character From Waukesha

 Three observations:

1.  For twenty-odd years (probably going back to his teen years)....this guy has been a drugged-up character.  In the past decade, I doubt if there's a single day that passed....that he didn't do some type of drug.  He was unhappy with life.  He was not achieving much of anything.  The drugs deaden the pain of that miserable existence.

2.  The twenty-plus pages of charges over the years?  The serious ones were negotiated down by prosecutors to get him the lowest amount of time in prison/jail.  If any one of the DA's had done their legal duty....he'd probably done real time in jail.  

3.  The next month for him in jail will be rough....without any drug access.  Might be the first time in 20 years that he went an entire week without drugs.  

Observations

 1.  News crew in Oakland was going out to cover a story....with a security guy accompanying them.  Friendly group came up upon them, and shot/wounded the security guard.  Signs of Mogadishu?  Inside the urban zones of SF and LA, it's just not that safe anymore.

2.  The German Euthanasia Association (there to help you end your suffering) has now said that they won't help you unless you are vaccinated for Covid.  The fact that you will be dead within a period of time with them helping you.....is a bit amazing.  

3.  After Hillary Clinton made her comment that we should all double down and be appreciative of Joe Biden's accomplishments as President....made me try to remember anything she did as Secretary of State for four years.  It must have been a very remarkable period, but I can't remember anything of the period.

4.  New shortage: Alcohol.  Dailywire reports that some states are reporting a shortage on hard alcohol.  Beer?  No.  

Joe's Ten Months

 My description of the past ten months?

If there was a rat problem at the White House....of ten possible solutions (even bringing in a dozen cats as one)....he will go to solution number eleven, thus increasing and doubling the rat problem.

I can't recall people being like this....that stumble from crisis to crisis, and mostly offer solutions that drag a problem out to a further distance, or make the problem even worse.

If you had a farmer like this....he'd be out-of-business in a single year.

If you had a chief of police like this.....he might linger around for a year or two, but be dragged into the mayor's office weekly for a discussion about screw-ups.

So none of this makes much sense.  The crew around him?  They have to be mostly dimwits or marginalized college students who got a meaningless degree.

This is usually where some boss would step in....thump a guy hard on correcting his mistakes, and give the guy a month to clean up his act, or be let go.  Presently, we've got three years of this to go.

Harris?  She can't say a word.  I don't think Joe would accept any advice from her.  The rest of the cabinet?  Losers.  When you needed competence out of Mayor Pete.....you found he was sitting at home on 'rest'.  

So, just settle back.  

How The Rittenhouse Case on President Biden Will Go?

 Just a humble opinion. 

Shortly after Christmas, I expect a defamation lawsuit to be started President Biden for his comments accusing Rittenhouse of being a 'white supremist'.

Amount?  I would suggest in the range of $10-million, with a personal apology issued from the White House.

CNN and the crew wilf laugh over the situation, and somewhere around March....two big-name lawyers will be hired by President Biden.

Some amount of $25,000 will be offered to Rittenhouse to just shut up and drop the case.

Along the end of 2022, I expect the President to be worried over the incoming Republican majority in the House, and expect Joe's team to offer around $100,000.  The case will end early 2023.....Rittenhouse winning and being awarded the $10-million.

Impeachment burden?  This will be added to the list.  

As for where the money will come from?  Well...Hunter, of course.  This will trigger a House review of just how much money that Joe has siphoned off Hunter over the past decade, and the tax implications.  

Can Biden Be a Lame Duck President at the Second-Year Point?

 You can ask a lot of stupid questions over this lame duck situation, and it should not have come up over the past week.  But it's being asked a good bit.

If Biden says 'no'....he won't run....what happens?  Generally, people believe that Mayor-Pete and VP Harris are the top two for the 2024 election.

People thrilled about this?  On Harris, I suspect if you measured Iowa, South Carolina, New Hampshire and Nevada....I don't think she has much to hope for.  On Mayor Pete....he might have some standings in Nevada, but he's got the logistics mess on his accomplishments list.  

In simple terms, the Democrats don't need 2022 or 2023 with President Biden listed as a lame duck.  It hurts the mid-terms of 2022, and the House/Senate race in 2024. 

Stacey Abrams as a contender?  Well...over the weekend, I read two pieces that went at her odds.  She has no message that resonates much with Iowa or New Hampshire folks.  On making speeches....if she hired two or three competent people....she might get some traction.  But her chief problem....she has a 3 x 5 inch index card for a resume.  There's no accomplishments that show strength or character.

Cuomo from NY?  Totally out.

Newsome from California?  He says he's not in the running (I have my doubts it'll stay that way).

Bernie Sanders?  He says he's finished for Presidential campaigns.

Warren?  She kinda noticed from the 2020 campaign....there's just zero thrills over her efforts.

For lame duck thrills?  You really don't want to enter 2022....with people already hyping up lame duck status for Biden.  You'd have to hear at least one question every day at the press conference....if Biden thinks he's a lame duck guy.  

Did anyone really think much about this in November 2020?  No.  That's the curious part of this discussion.  It's like some guy waking up in some Twilight Zone episode and not recognizing much of anything familar.  

Afghan Woes

 Over the weekend, I watched BBC news.  They came to a new topic over the Taliban and Afghanistan....relating to TV productions.

After some review, the Taliban concluded that there was no decency in TV productions.  So there are some new rules.

1.  Foreign films shown on Afghan TV (Rambo for example), can't be shown, if they promote foreign lifestyles/cultures. Depending on how you interpret this.....about 90-percent of what used to be on Afghan TV.....can no longer be shown.  Alice in Wonderland, Little Shop of Horrors, Three Amigos.....out.  

2.  Any kind of show which might in some way....insult Islam....is forbidden.  

3.  Any show/movie which might show a bit of a guy's chest...is forbidden.  

4.  Any show/movie with women in a leading role....is forbidden.  It's ok to show them in the background, or demonstrate a woman preparing a meal for the husband.  Beyond that....no women in primary roles.

What'll happen to the TV networks?  I'm guessing that they will go to mostly scripted shows where Muhammad-Joe has transmission problems, and discusses this with Muhammad-Bob.  Or you might have four guys building a house, and discussing roofing strategies for an hour.  Or you might have a farmer discussing his foot fungus problem.

In simple terms....the DVD business is going to erupt and folks will be quietly renting the entire season of Amish Mafia, or the five Rambo movies.  

About a year or two into this....various Taliban members will comment to the top guy....it's just pretty boring at night....no one wants to watch three guys spend an hour cleaning rifles, or watch some 80-year-old guy tell one of his six snake stories over and over.

The senior Taliban guy will tell them to just shut up, and quietly go back to watching his 1982 DVD set of the Dynasty series.  He thinks that Joan Collins is 'hot'.