1. Odds of Fox News being prepared to sell?
By mid-summer, if you see Sean Hannity 'let-go'....I'd say it's a 90-percent chance. Who buys? Some non-public company.....like Blackrock....who sees a distressed news group and under-priced.
Fox News never recovering? I would say their anti-Trump stance and the big guys being let go....sets the new market value to about 60-percent of their peak.
Who gains viewers? Podcast group, Joe Rogan, smaller news units.
2. Joe Biden having problems in selling his position on LGTBQ and 'counter-can't-define-a-woman' folks?
Somehow, his key insiders believe this is a big-tent agenda that sells well across the US. I'd say it's more likely that only 30-to-35 percent of pro-Biden people feel this way. If you made the election on this agenda....with Joe trying to tell the story....it's a colossal failure.
3. If people start up being rude and obnoxious......how much effort will it take for you to lessen your negative view of them?
It's kinda like walking into a restaurant and noticing a cockroach on the table as you sit there. Pretty good odds you will get and leave....never to return ever again.
4. Can President Biden make a 3-line statement without a teleprompter......without a mistake?
I'd be willing to lay down a $500 bet that he can't accomplish this.
5. CBS saying from a poll that 72-percent of Americans believe 'things-are-out-of-control'?
Polling across the nation.....even I'm shocked at the rate of things. No one asked though....HOW things are out-of-control.
If you asked me....dealing with paranoid schizophrenic folks, the drugged-up crowd, and regular criminals...probably have drained half the nation of regular patience.
6. All this chatter about female crash-test dummies?
If you have time to worry about this....you might need a new reality to work upon.
4 comments:
Is it safe to assume that a female crash test dummy would be representative of a woman, involved in a vehicle accident??!!? So by the very definition of a female crash test dummy, you would have to have a definition of a what a woman is, in order to create this female crash test dummy. So it seems apparent that we now, only have male crash test dummies and females are not represented in crash studies. Logically would not transvestite crash test dummies also be needed???!!!??
Come to think of it, how would he even know which crash test dummies are female? How would they differ? If they make crash test dummies to mimic the effects of car crashes on human physiology, and then they make a male and female version, doesn’t that mean they’re admitting that there are physiological differences between males and females?
I have to say, I’m a little surprised at this blatant bigotry. Seriously, how dare they relegate crash test dummies to an oppressive binary of male and female! How dare the government not spend $20 million on creating gender fluid or nonbinary test crash dummies to fight the oppressive gender binary!
Having watched a podcast several years ago of crash-test dummies....I noticed then that none of the dummies had 'johnsons'...or boobs. I think the general attitude of crash engineers/scientists....it was the head that mattered in the end (surviving the test).
Somewhere out there....there's some Utah company (in the desert) that puts a boob-set on dummies (marking them up $700) and offers a 'johnson' model (marked up $150). No real difference but the company will clear fake profit off this
Post a Comment