Wednesday, 19 August 2015

The "Wall" Crowd

Generally, you can go and ask the build-the-wall crowd  and the anti-build-the-wall-crowd various questions over immigration, the 'Mexicans', legal terms and ethics.....but never get any real comforting answers.

So I'm a history guy, and I like how history relates lessons learned....some wise, and some pointless.

The Chinese started a wall operation in the period of 700 BC.  When it was finally done.....roughly five-hundred years would have passed.  Course, this wasn't a wire fence, or modern technology type was brick and cement.  What the Chinese wanted....was a wall that stood the issues of time.  I should also mention that this was a 13,000 mile wall....way more than from you'd want from Texas to California.

Chinese historians will tell a blunt way....the way achieved everything desired.  They will also note that it was a public project, and employed folks of the region....keeping them happy, occupied and fulfilled.  The foreign guys stayed out for the most part (they were failures of the wall), and some folks did climb over.....but without was a bit difficult to march on and get somewhere.

The East Germans built two walls.  One was the border fence along the front between East and West Germany.  The other was the circling fence or wall that was put up in Berlin.  The evil West Berlin folks, with no inhibitions or control of desires were kept from the "people of perfection" in DDR (the Democratic folks who liked Communism).

If you go back 1,500 years across Germany itself today, you will find evidence of hundreds of walled cities and towns.  The walls were built to keep trouble-makers out, and protect folks during periods of incursion.  Generally, the walls worked unless the trouble-makers were creative and found ways to break the walls down.

Generally, if you build a wall....someone will come along and say they can conquer the wall.  People take pride in overcoming walls.  If you built a seventy-foot tall wall.....there'd be some guy to come along real quick and find five ways of getting over the top of that wall.  The guy might even write a book about the experience.

What I see from that he might actually get elected and be part of the wall-crowd.  Then he'd arrive in DC to find that the Republicans really can't find any enthusiasm or willingness to put money into a wall.  The Democrats will just stand there.....gleefully smiling and not having to say anything because the fraudulent Republicans are doing all the work for them.

Trump would stand there for around six minutes....listening to the reasons why they won't fund it, and then say fine.....he'd just assign the US military to the task and just start yanking them back from South Korea, Europe and the build the wall.  Republicans would go on TV and chat about how you need to build a wall, but only in the right way, at the right time, and with the right plan.  This would consume an entire weekend of political chat shows.

Generally, I don't think the wall would do an awful lot because folks would just seek out smarter ways.....maybe like digging a tunnel or just taking a rubber boat from Mexico to the Texas coastline (kinda like they do from Libya to Italy today).  The thing is....we've gone so long in this fake agenda business, that we really don't believe much of anything that's said either party.

Being against the Mexicans?  Well.....I'd be all for a wall built up along the Canadian border too....except I know that the Canadians don't really care much to illegally cross (there might be forty a year that do it illegally).  The eventual problem I see is that 300,000 Nigerians or Chinese guys might also get the idea that it's awful easy......sailing to Mexico, and then just hiking across.  Would we be just as happy to see them crossing the border as the Mexicans?  I have doubts.

So, maybe at the end of the 2016 election.....we might accidentally elect Trump as President and start on some wall.  We might even call up some Chinese guys or former East German engineers to ask how you build a good wall.

The Server Issue

I've watched the Hillary server story bounce around for several weeks now.  This new piece.....where the FBI has the server but it's been 'wiped' has stood out.  Yesterday, the FBI kinda hinted.....they think they can recover data from the 'wiped' server.

For a number of years, I worked around IT folks and the classified environment.  When it came time to bring a server down or get rid of the hard were left with two options.  One was total destruction or magnetic degaussing....which was a hundred-percent deal and no possible recovery.  This costs some funding/money.  The second method was some approved software deal which would wipe the drive.

An IT guy explained it to me one day.....there was the cheap method where some companies would just do a once over software and they were satisfied.  As the guy said.....with that software type and attitude, if you had the right secondary software and were could recover some to all of the data on the drive.  The Air Force was always picky about this and paid for the more costly software.....which did the four-star job.

Oddly, with the people I worked with.....they liked the total destruction method....where it got shipped to some facility in the states and put into a grinder.

I look at the Hillary episode and note that they never once seemed to worry about the server falling into the wrong hands (like the FBI).  The company they hired?  They weren't exactly a four-star big-name company.  I'd have my doubts that they went out and bought the big-name software to wipe dozens of times over.....some hard drive.  They probably put some junior technician in charge of this and he used a regular wipe program that wasn't that efficient in nature.

So, Hillary is sitting there and wondering about this stupid hard drive and the contents.  If the FBI brings back all the data.....then what?  It'll take six months to read all the data and come to some conclusions.  Is there other email accounts?  Are there forty-odd people using this one server?  Are there discussions about bribes and special favors?

If the FBI hadn't been called into one would think much about the episode.  Now?  You ought to have doubts about the nature of the Hillary campaign and if it can survive this.

The Democrats are sitting there with three marginal guys and a dismal view of the convention period for 2016.  If a quarter of the Democratic voters fail to show up for the election in November of does this hurt the bulk of the 'other' guys running for Democratic office (Senator on down to state parks commissioner)?  In Alabama, twenty-five thousand fewer Democrats voting in a national election a big deal.

I probably harp on this too much.....but the party is responsible for ALL of their players, and to have the national office equate to marginal interest for the public has a major impact on state-by-state election issues.  Even bond issues and state law changes.....all would have a different turn-out if there's no four-star person running for President's office.