Billions required? He didn't say the amount ....but it'd have to be way over $500-billion.
I pondered over it for five minutes, and came to these three issues:
1. Even if you laid the cash....these idiots were geniuses who made the fire threat to such a remarkable level, and would do so again....meaning another Newsom-like character would appear in five to ten years....talking about rebuilding L.A. 3.0 under another Marshall Plan-like initiative.
2. The building permit business....would lead to fewer than 250 structures a year....so this Marshall Plan deal....might take 25 years to erect.
3. Finally, it would logical that environmentalists would fight this left-and-right....to limit the rebuilding to half the present size, and to make it carbon-free as much as possible.
1 comment:
I suppose a case could be made for those millions of tons of 'carbon-whatsit' recently added to the dirt and construction would 'displace' it back into atmo and that will be The!End!Of!Everything!©.
.
Jesting aside, the original situation remains:
* Too many humans chasing too little water.
.
A few years ago, somebody did a story about new Jerry Seinfeld and Schwarzenegger houses.
They were built using sticks, and I thought that was dumb
Over a century ago just up the road, Hearst built his castle of concrete, and it seems to be still hanging around mostly.
Post a Comment