Somewhere in 2007, there was an interview between a
What the senator creates is something that he can’t envision. As power requirement arise, the energy companies will go through their planning process. As any truthful grid expert and they will tell you that solar and wind energy are great as secondary sources, but you need to rely on the three standard power sources (coal, hydro, and nuclear) for eighty percent of your power. Wind and solar are NOT reliable. It’s the simple truth.
So the engineers will sit there and come to an agreement to build a new plant, thus triggering the Obama taxes, fees, and issues. The company doesn’t care….they need power….because the customers need power. So the company will do the right thing….pass those fees, cost and taxes onto the consumer. Yep, you….the consumer.
Angry? Upset? What will you do? There’s nothing you can do. His tactics here are simple. Be as stupid as possible…..and hope that you are just as stupid. When you feel good about stopping the coal plants….and then see them built….ask yourself who paid for it? And then reality will set in. This is what we all earned for being stupid.
The companies that use bulk supply of power? Don’t worry….they will pass their costs onto you the consumer of bread, milk, twinkies, computers, cars or light bulbs.
So if you were paying $110 a month before on power….your power costs will move up to $135 under the Obama program. And the price of a computer? Maybe another three dollars here. The twinkie will cost 8 cents more. The bread will cost an extra $16 a year.
So if you were paying $110 a month before on power….your power costs will move up to $135 under the Obama program. And the price of a computer? Maybe another three dollars here. The twinkie will cost 8 cents more. The bread will cost an extra $16 a year. You get the bill, not the electrical company.
The money collected? It goes straight into the pocket of the revenue collection guys. They pass it onto the government, who can spend freely or grant it out to wealth transformation or redistribution.
You will pay every penny of the Obama plan. You will pay the taxes. You will pay the fees. You will pay the increased costs.
Finally, what are we saying here? Bankruptcy is a government tactic? Really? So if we are unhappy with McDonalds...we rig up beef sales in the same manner and make cattlemen go bankrupt....in support of a US government policy? If we are unhappy with boxing, we rig it up with a bankruptcy policy as well? Something in this logic of pushing people, cities, and businesses toward bankruptcy....sounds like a man with potatoes for brains. You can’t stand in front of any group of serious journalists and pretend that bankruptcy is a solid policy of fixing your problems. I might as well say that bankrupting Chicago would be a positive thing, and find some logic to prove my point.
I know that all of you are rushing now to nominate me for the Nobel Prize for Economics on my new concept of "bankruptcy" as a tool for fixing your problems. But think long and hard on this....what idiot would toss up a concept like this, and then what idiot would be willing to accept a policy like this?