For the past week, I've noticed the term 'due-processs'....getting mentioned a good bit. So to four facts:
1. Does due-process have to be accomplished by a judge?
NO. Some people probably believe this....but you can't find too many rules that say this in plain-simple language.
2. Can due-process be accomplished strictly by a lawyer?
Well....no....in fact, you don't even need a four-year degree....to be a due-process official. You could just as well designate some Army Captain, or supervisor of a border-control station with due-process authority. You will find in various European countries that deportation due-process rests with a border-control 'boss' (not a judge).
3. Are we taking due-process too far?
Well....eventually your 13-year old kid (Marvin) will get into school trouble, and Marvin facing disciplinary woes....will demand due-process...over and over....saying that merely a teacher issuing an order is not enough, and even a principal is not capable.
4. Won't Trump eventually react and say no federal judge has the capacity to issue a ruling on due-process?
Well...yeah, it's conceivable. Maybe our whole democracy now rests on everyone getting a minimum of five due-processes....for everything we might stand accused of.