Construct?

For several years, I've had this problem.  At least five to ten times a week....I hear someone being interviewed or via a podcast....talking about a 'CONSTRUCT'.  They don't really go into detail....just that CONSTRUCT is important, and I probably need to respect it.

So I spent yesterday reading up.

Construct simply means that you had this idea,  or concept....that was created out of thin-air...to explain something.  

I'm not saying it's factual or legit....just that you heard about this complex situation, and you pondered upon it...coming to a construct.

This would be like you hearing that the McDonalds ice cream machine frequently breaks down, and you've created a 17-page Construct to explain this to non-intellectuals.

The problem ere...is that you probably started off with the Construct details being fairly complex phenomena.  If you'd asked about daily maintenance of the McDonalds ice cream machine....you'd find that maybe one guy in the whole  building understands the dynamics of daily and the other 34 folks aren't keen on maintenance.  

Yeah, in my Construct....the McDonalds ice cream problem is five lines at best (not 16 pages), and  you don't need to divide folks into intellectual or non-intellectual groups.

I went to college in the 1980s, and I don't remember any of this Construct-BS. It has to be something  blended in with the 2010 to 2020 era.

My problem today?  Once you say 'Construct'....I probably cut off a good thirty-percent of my attention span, and am mostly skeptical about the topic you want to explain.

Establishing a 'Construct' of a 'Construct'?  That's another odd point....if you can't really get to the problem and the solution  within a 60-second period....most folks are likely not to buy into your analysis.

I'm of the mind that we are drifting around to a anti-Construct era....where no one wants to hear your problem or solution.